2019
DOI: 10.1111/ele.13372
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bias in the detection of negative density dependence in plant communities

Abstract: Regression dilution is a statistical inference bias that causes underestimation of the strength of dependency between two variables when the predictors are error‐prone proxies (EPPs). EPPs are widely used in plant community studies focused on negative density‐dependence (NDD) to quantify competitive interactions. Because of the nature of the bias, conspecific NDD is often overestimated in recruitment analyses, and in some cases, can be erroneously detected when absent. In contrast, for survival analyses, EPPs … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
160
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(165 citation statements)
references
References 94 publications
3
160
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, there is evidence for greater biotic interaction strength in the tropics than at higher latitudes (Roslin et al ). Observed patterns of greater impact of trees on nearby conspecifics nearer the Equator (LaManna et al , Detto et al ), suggest likely variation in effect size across latitude. Therefore, it is important to consider latitude when trying to understand geographic patterns in strength of the dilution effect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, there is evidence for greater biotic interaction strength in the tropics than at higher latitudes (Roslin et al ). Observed patterns of greater impact of trees on nearby conspecifics nearer the Equator (LaManna et al , Detto et al ), suggest likely variation in effect size across latitude. Therefore, it is important to consider latitude when trying to understand geographic patterns in strength of the dilution effect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies at the same site have characterized interspecific variation in seed dispersal kernels (Muller-Landau et al, 2008),found evidence for negative density dependence on seedling recruitment (Harms et al, 2000, Wright et al, 2005b, as well as distance-/ density-dependent mortality during the seedling stage (Comita et al, 2010, Murphy et al, 2017, but see Detto et al (2019) for discussion of potential biases in some of these studies. We consider seedling establishment at two stages (new recruits and seedlings 20 cm or taller) to distinguish mortality in the seed-to-seedling transition from that of the early seedling life.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We consider seedling establishment at two stages (new recruits and seedlings 20 cm or taller) to distinguish mortality in the seed-to-seedling transition from that of the early seedling life. Previous studies at the same site have characterized interspecific variation in seed dispersal kernels (Muller-Landau et al, 2008),found evidence for negative density dependence on seedling recruitment (Harms et al, 2000, Wright et al, 2005b, as well as distance-/ density-dependent mortality during the seedling stage (Comita et al, 2010, Murphy et al, 2017, but see Detto et al (2019) for discussion of potential biases in some of these studies. Drawing from the approach of Muller-Landau et al (2008), we fit hierarchical Bayesian models for each species and life stage (seed, new recruit, and 20cm seedling) to estimate the annual fecundity (total seeds or seedlings per unit of reproductive tree basal area), the seed dispersal or seedling establishment kernel, and the spatial aggregation of individuals relative to expected density simultaneously.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S9 is the same figure taking into account only significant interactions) discrete-time Lotka-Volterra equivalent in the Supporting Information; even though there is a relationship between intra/inter ratios in both models, the relationship is not trivial when abundances vary greatly between species. Hence, to some degree, intra/inter ratios can differ between model frameworks or ways of measuring density-dependencies (e.g., a high measurement error due to using proxies of densities for plants can result in bias in interaction coefficient estimates, Detto et al, 2019). However, a ratio intra/inter at least twice larger than the ones previously found may call for other explanations.…”
Section: Strong Self-regulation and Facilitationmentioning
confidence: 89%