2016
DOI: 10.1080/02699206.2016.1233292
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bias in the perception of phonetic detail in children’s speech: A comparison of categorical and continuous rating scales

Abstract: Previous research has shown that continuous rating scales can be used to assess phonetic detail in children’s productions, and could potentially be used to detect covert contrasts. Two experiments examined whether continuous rating scales have the additional benefit of being less susceptible to task-related biasing than categorical phonetic transcriptions. In both experiments, judgments of children’s productions of /s/ and /θ/ were interleaved with two types of rating tasks designed to induce bias: continuous … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The voiced consonant (/dɑ/) always appeared on the left end of the line, and the unvoiced consonant (/tɑ/) always appeared on the right end of the line. To be consistent with prior research, the VAS line was unlabeled, but the values ranged from 0 (/dɑ/) to 535 (/tɑ/), with a midpoint of 268 [ 76 , 78 ]. Participants were encouraged to use the entire line if they felt it was appropriate [ 75 , 76 , 78 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The voiced consonant (/dɑ/) always appeared on the left end of the line, and the unvoiced consonant (/tɑ/) always appeared on the right end of the line. To be consistent with prior research, the VAS line was unlabeled, but the values ranged from 0 (/dɑ/) to 535 (/tɑ/), with a midpoint of 268 [ 76 , 78 ]. Participants were encouraged to use the entire line if they felt it was appropriate [ 75 , 76 , 78 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Perceptual gradiency was measured using a continuous VAS task, which has been shown to be sensitive to individual differences in phoneme categorization [ 53 , 73 78 ], and is less susceptible to task-related biases than categorical judgments [ 76 ]. In VAS tasks, participants are provided with a line with endpoints representing the extremes of a continuum, like /s/ on the left end and /∫/ on the right end of a centroid frequency continuum [ 73 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With the benefits reviewed in these studies, continuous rating scales such as VASs and sliders are frequently used in healthcare and the social sciences—for example, in tinnitus, endometriosis pain treatment, and orthopedics studies (Adamchic et al., ; Bourdel et al., ; Wall et al., ); in measuring happiness and patient satisfaction (Studer, ; Voutilainen et al., ); and in linguistics (Munson, Schellinger, & Edwards, ). Researchers in these studies found paper‐ or web‐based VASs or sliders to be reliable measurement instruments, and recommended them over 5‐, 7‐, or 10‐point discrete rating scales.…”
Section: Research Findings On Benefits and Drawbacks Of Using Continumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our study is inspired by two existing studies on the L1 perception that looked into English-speaking adults’ utilizations of multiple acoustic cues (primary cue of VOT and secondary cue of F0, that is, fundamental frequency at the post-consonantal vocalic onset for voiced-voiceless stops contrast) and their influence on the gradient manner of category judgments (voiced vs. voiceless stops; Kapnoula et al., 2017; Kong & Edwards, 2016). Instead of adopting the traditional forced-choice identification task, these studies administered a visual analog scaling (VAS) task that asked listeners to judge stimulus sounds not in a binary way (i.e., one category or the other) but in a continuous way (see Figure 1(a)) (Massaro & Cohen, 1983; Munson et al., 2017; Schellinger et al., 2017). Since listeners are allowed to click any locations along the arrow depending on the relative closeness of the stimuli to two given categories, this task encourages listeners to judge the category membership of the stimuli on a gradient scale and makes it possible to quantify individual listeners’ dichotomic or gradient decisions of speech categories.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%