2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-25226-1_48
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biasing Effects of Non-Representative Samples of Quasi-Orders in the Assessment of Recovery Quality of IITA-Type Item Hierarchy Mining

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

3
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, up to now it has not been possible to create truly representative samples for larger item numbers. Thus, previous simulation studies had to live with approximations, which in some cases had a negative impact on the simulation results and caused biased or incorrect conclusions (Ünlü and Schrepp, 2015 , in press ). The only possible workaround was to draw samples of quasi-orders from the prior constructed set of all quasi-orders, which merely worked for small item sets.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, up to now it has not been possible to create truly representative samples for larger item numbers. Thus, previous simulation studies had to live with approximations, which in some cases had a negative impact on the simulation results and caused biased or incorrect conclusions (Ünlü and Schrepp, 2015 , in press ). The only possible workaround was to draw samples of quasi-orders from the prior constructed set of all quasi-orders, which merely worked for small item sets.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since all known ITA algorithms are sensitive to the structure of the quasi-order, it is important to use a representative set of quasi-orders as the basis for the simulations. Using non-representative quasi-order samples yielded biased or erroneous simulation results regarding the recovery quality of the algorithms (Ünlü and Schrepp, in press ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The input of any IITA analysis is a binary data matrix (subjects represented by rows, items represented by columns), and the output is a quasi-order on the item set. The IITA item hierarchy mining techniques are computational, and typically, evaluated and compared based on extensive simulation studies (Ünlü and Schrepp, 2015(Ünlü and Schrepp, , 2016a(Ünlü and Schrepp, , 2017. At the basis of these simulation studies is a large set of randomly generated quasi-orders, each of which is posited to represent the true dependencies underlying the simulated data.…”
Section: Representative Quasi-ordersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The representativeness of a randomly generated subset, or sample, of quasi-orders on an item set means that each quasiorder on the item set has equal probability of being selected as part of the sample. Ünlü and Schrepp (2015Ünlü and Schrepp ( , 2016aÜnlü and Schrepp ( , 2017 showed that the use of non-representative samples of quasi-orders led to biased or erroneous conclusions regarding the recovery and coverage qualities of the IITA algorithms in simulation studies. These authors were able to correct the problems induced by non-representative samples with the use of representative random quasi-orders.…”
Section: Representative Quasi-ordersmentioning
confidence: 99%