2009
DOI: 10.1103/physreve.80.041705
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biaxiality at the isotropic-nematic interface with planar anchoring

Abstract: We revisit the classic problem of the structure of the isotropic-nematic interface within Ginzburg-Landau-de Gennes theory, refining previous analytic treatments of biaxiality at the interface. We compare our analysis with numerical results obtained through a highly accurate spectral collocation scheme for the solution of the Landau-Ginzburg-de Gennes equations. In comparison to earlier work, we obtain improved agreement with numerics for both the uniaxial and biaxial profiles, accurate asymptotic results for … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The codirector l and the secondary director m (not shown) also have a singular structure with B 2 reaching a maximum on a noncircular ring embedded in the outer region of the droplet. This is consistent with the understanding that a planar interface exhibits local biaxiality for large κ [48]. When approximating the droplets to be circular, the critical droplet size can be estimated in terms of the parameters in the GLdG free energy.…”
Section: Nucleation In Supercooled Isotropic Phasesupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The codirector l and the secondary director m (not shown) also have a singular structure with B 2 reaching a maximum on a noncircular ring embedded in the outer region of the droplet. This is consistent with the understanding that a planar interface exhibits local biaxiality for large κ [48]. When approximating the droplets to be circular, the critical droplet size can be estimated in terms of the parameters in the GLdG free energy.…”
Section: Nucleation In Supercooled Isotropic Phasesupporting
confidence: 84%
“…SMOL is a stochastic generalization of the deterministic method of lines approach 59 that relies on discretizing the spatial derivates without a temporal discretization, thus yielding to a set of ordinary differential equations in time, that can be easily integrated using the standard numerical libraries 60 . Though spatial accuracy can be increased by using spectral collocation method 61 , obtained solution is usually limited by the temporal accuracy of the integrator. SMOL is numerically stable without computational hindrance with convergence, is less computationally overloaded, spatiotemporally second order accurate, satisfies discrete FDT and can faithfully reproduce lab-based experiments in silico 7 , 13 , 20 , 29 , 30 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…homeotropic, planar, or oblique anchoring) on the nematic state. It turns out that the relative sizes of different elastic coefficients also play important roles on anchoring conditions on the interface, see Kamil-Bhattacharjee-Adhikari-Menon [25,26]. There are proposed forms of the surface energy by Chanderashka [5], Ericksen [11] based on a phenomenological theory.…”
Section: Isotropic and Nematic Phase Transitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, it was shown by Popa-Nita-Sluckin-Wheeler [43] a region proximate to the interface can exhibit biaxiality within the LGdG theory, even if the stable nematic phase is purely uniaxial, provided planar anchoring is enforced on the interface. Such a biaxiality is absent if the anchoring is homeotropic [6], see also [25,26].…”
Section: Isotropic and Nematic Phase Transitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%