Bibliometric analysis of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors channel research (2000-2020)

Zhu, Xueping; Zhou, Yan; Gao, Yuan; Shi, Jingjing; Shi, Shuai; Zhang, Limei; Chai, Ruoning; Du, Yihang; Duan, Chenglin; Hu, Yuanhui

doi:10.1080/19336950.2021.1882113

Cited by 4 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 51 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This trend analysis has likewise been applied to the basic science papers where, for example new specific receptor targets with possible future options in pain management are described (Romero & Portillo‐Salido, 2019; Shi et al., 2020; Zhu et al., 2021).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The evolving landscape of publishing in the field of pain: An automated bibliometric analysis from 1975 to 2020

Arendt‐Nielsen,

Pedersen,

Dreier

et al. 2023

European Journal of Pain

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundThe aims of this bibliometric analysis were (1) a longitudinal analysis of the publication landscape in the field of pain (1975–2020) and (2) to characterize the overall publication profiles for two selected journals: European Journal of Pain and PAIN® utilizing an automated approach.MethodsDatabase searches in Scopus extracted all journals with ‘pain’ in their title. For the two specific journals, papers were manually/automatically profiled into preclinical, human and translational studies.ResultsA gross list of 64 journals in the field of pain consisting of both active and ceased journals in Scopus were included in this analysis which identified 62,565 papers with approximately 4000 papers published/year. These papers include 2759 and 9156 papers in Eur. J. Pain and PAIN®, respectively. Currently, there are 24 active ‘pain’ journals. Authors/paper increase from 2 to 7 indicating a development from mono‐disciplinary to multi‐disciplinary studies. The overall publication profiles assessing preclinical, human (experimental/clinical) and translational papers in Eur. J. Pain and PAIN® were almost similar (14%, 75% and 10% versus 26%, 63% and 10%). Papers have changed over the years from mono‐disciplinary studies (e.g. behavioural studies) to multi‐disciplinary studies (e.g. combined behavioural and cell studies). After optimization, the search model matched the manual screening by 100%, 98% and 96% for the preclinical, clinical and healthy volunteer categories.ConclusionsOver the last 45 years, more than 60,000 pain‐related papers have been published. Papers develop over the years from mono‐disciplinary to multi‐disciplinary studies. The overall publication profile including preclinical, human (experimental/clinical) and translational papers was almost similar in Eur. J. Pain and PAIN®.SignificanceThe bibliometric analysis of a pain journal provides information on which specific areas of research are published, how this may have changed over the years and how a journal is positioned compared with other journals in the field.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The evolving landscape of publishing in the field of pain: An automated bibliometric analysis from 1975 to 2020

Arendt‐Nielsen,

Pedersen,

Dreier

et al. 2023

European Journal of Pain

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Our methodology is similar to that described by Zhu et al (2021) [ 18 ], which describes a bibliometric analysis of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. VOSviewer 1.6.18 [ 19 , 20 ] was used to identify the most active authors, their institutions and countries, as well as the most cited articles and co-cited references.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Bibliometric Review of the Literature on Cone Snail Peptide Toxins from 2000 to 2022

2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The venom of marine cone snails is mainly composed of peptide toxins called conopeptides, among which conotoxins represent those that are disulfide-rich. Publications on conopeptides frequently state that conopeptides attract considerable interest for their potent and selective activity, but there has been no analysis yet that formally quantifies the popularity of the field. We fill this gap here by providing a bibliometric analysis of the literature on cone snail toxins from 2000 to 2022. Our analysis of 3028 research articles and 393 reviews revealed that research in the conopeptide field is indeed prolific, with an average of 130 research articles per year. The data show that the research is typically carried out collaboratively and worldwide, and that discoveries are truly a community-based effort. An analysis of the keywords provided with each article revealed research trends, their evolution over the studied period, and important milestones. The most employed keywords are related to pharmacology and medicinal chemistry. In 2004, the trend in keywords changed, with the pivotal event of that year being the approval by the FDA of the first peptide toxin drug, ziconotide, a conopeptide, for the treatment of intractable pain. The corresponding research article is among the top ten most cited articles in the conopeptide literature. From the time of that article, medicinal chemistry aiming at engineering conopeptides to treat neuropathic pain ramped up, as seen by an increased focus on topological modifications (e.g., cyclization), electrophysiology, and structural biology.

show abstract

“…Author co-occurrence maps can provide information on infl uential research groups and potential collaborators. It can help researchers fi nd potential collaborators [10]. In the 30 and surgical robots.…”

Section: Active Authorsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The number of Chinese literature publications has gradually increased over the last fi ve years, owing to increased government investment and adequate scientifi c research funds. The number of publications in peer-reviewed journals is also growing, and the gap with the West is gradually closing [10]. However, aside from the aforementioned countries and regions, relevant scientifi c research in other places is underinvested, and the gap is gradually widening.…”

Section: There Is a Concentration Of Research Institutions And Nation...mentioning

confidence: 99%

A Bibliometric Analysis: The Application of Robotic Technology in Spine Surgery in the Past 30 Years

Zhou,

Ma,

Wei

et al. 2024

J Biomed Res Environ Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose: The aim of this study is to comprehensively analyze the application of robotic technology in spine surgery and display the current research status in this field. Methods: To investigate the distribution and characteristics of robotics in spinal surgery, the publications in PubMed and web of science was examined and analyzed. We utilized CiteSpace and VOSviewer to review and visualize academic literature from the previous 30 years on the use of robotic technology in spine surgery. Results: According to the findings of the research, it indicates that robotics is becoming more widespread in spine surgery, with robotics playing an important role in pedicle screw placement, intraoperative navigation, imaging guidance, and minimizing radiation exposure for surgeons and surgical teams. how to establish a set of standards, how to reduce personnel radiation exposure in the operating room, postoperative follow-up between traditional and robotic surgery, and the prognosis and incidence of complications such as spondylosis, and so on are all topics that will be discussed. Conclusion: The study looked into the recovery time following robotic surgery, the expense of hospitalization, the robotic technology in terms of time during surgical procedures, blood loss, and implant placement accuracy, which are all topics that will be investigated more in the future. While there are some discrepancies in government, physician, and patient views, expectations, and clinical data for robotic surgery, robots will increasingly be used in areas that demand great precision. The application of robotic technology in spine surgery will be extensive.

show abstract

Bibliometric analysis of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors channel research (2000-2020)

Cited by 4 publications

References 51 publications

The evolving landscape of publishing in the field of pain: An automated bibliometric analysis from 1975 to 2020

The evolving landscape of publishing in the field of pain: An automated bibliometric analysis from 1975 to 2020

Bibliometric Review of the Literature on Cone Snail Peptide Toxins from 2000 to 2022

A Bibliometric Analysis: The Application of Robotic Technology in Spine Surgery in the Past 30 Years

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About