Bibliometric analysis of qualitative research on patients’ experiences of intestinal stoma published between 2002 ‐ 2018

Capilla‐Díaz, Concepción; Durán‐López, Maria Isabel; Martínez‐Guerrero, Juan Manuel; Reina-Leal, Liliana Marcela; Gómez‐Urquiza, José Luis; González, María Gálvez; Hueso‐Montoro, César

doi:10.1111/jan.14321

Cited by 6 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 26 publications

(38 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The analysis of scientific production, based on bibliometric parameters, is an essential tool for evaluating knowledge and determining the progress of disciplines and their fields. In the present case, given the specificity of the subject, this type of work provides useful information to understand the general properties of the state of knowledge about art therapy (Capilla-Díaz et al, 2020), since it offers a retrospective vision of the scientific production in the world based on the main bibliometric indicators.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 98%

Trends in Research on Art Therapy Indexed in the Web of Science: A Bibliometric Analysis

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim: Despite the increase in international research in art therapy, few studies have been developed with a bibliometric approach which describe the situation regarding this area of knowledge. Thus, the aim of this study is to describe and contextualize international scientific production in the visual arts modality in the context of artistic therapies, to offer a broader and more in-depth vision of the structure of this area of knowledge through of a bibliometric analysis of the publications indexed in the core collection of the Web of Science.Methods: This is a retrospective, exploratory and descriptive, cross-sectional study to analyze the bibliographic data retrieved from the databases of the core collection. The analysis parameters included the data corresponding to the production according to type of document, country, journal, and institution. In addition, the main lines of research were located and classified and the subject matter of the most cited articles in each of them was summarized. Four periods were selected, between 1994 and 2020, to facilitate the thematic analysis and offer an evolutionary perspective of art therapy research.Results: A total of 563 works were published, in 250 journals, in the 63 years between 1958, when the first document was published, and April 2021. The annual growth rate was 7.3% with a mean average of 8.7 publications per year, and 83.13% of the published works were articles. A total of 1,269 authors from 56 countries were counted. The mean number of citations per document was 5.6 and the mean number of citations per document and year was 0.6. The main research domains were psychology and/or rehabilitation and the highest production on this topic was concentrated in only three journals. In general, a high degree of variability was observed in the study topics and numerous theoretical and methodological articles. The most used visual arts modalities were in the main drawing, painting and photography.Conclusion: This work did not find previous existence of any bibliometric analysis on the international scientific production in art therapy. In general terms, there has been a substantial growth in the number of publications on the subject over the last decade. However, this research area does not appear to have peaked, but, on the contrary, is still growing and progressing despite its long history in clinical practice.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 98%

Trends in Research on Art Therapy Indexed in the Web of Science: A Bibliometric Analysis

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Bibliometric analysis is a powerful statistical analysis tool, contributing to conduct a scientific and objective analysis of the articles quantitatively (Capilla et al, 2020; Yang et al., 2019), through which we can gain an in‐depth understanding of a research domain, the topical hotspots and emerging trends comprehensively and systematically. Also, it has been widely used in many areas, such as nursing (Dong et al., 2020; Kantek & Yesilbas, 2020; Nicoll et al., 2020; Zhu et al., 2020), biology (Zhai et al., 2018) and medicine (Zhao et al, 2018).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Research focus and thematic trends in magnet hospital research: A bibliometric analysis of the global publications

Yang

Liu

Zeng

et al. 2021

Journal of Advanced Nursing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aims The study aims to carry out a bibliometric analysis of the research on magnet hospital from 1988‐2020. Design A statistical and visualization bibliometric analysis was conducted between February‐May 2020. Methods The information was extracted from Web of Science by the topic advanced search strategy. HistCite‐Pro, Excel, GunnMap, BibExcel and VOSviewer were used to extract, integrate and visualize the bibliometric information. Furthermore, the research contents of the core‐authors were explored and summarized by reviewing all the published articles. Results Articles (N = 396) published in 107 journals were retrieved in the Web of Science from 1988‐2020. The USA (N = 319) and University of Pennsylvania (N = 38) were the most productive country and institution respectively. Author co‐citation and bibliographic‐coupling network analysis identified that Aiken, Kramer, Laschinger, Schmalenberg, Lake and Johantgen were the major contributors and leaders in this field. According to the research content of the main contributors and keyword co‐occurrence analysis result, the research focus could be divided into four parts: the mechanism leading to the outcomes differences for magnet hospital, the evidence‐based practice, the outcomes comparison between magnet hospital and non‐magnet hospital and the practice environment. Conclusion This bibliometric study offered a comprehensive overview of current study status of magnet hospital and this area has been drawn increasing attention over the years. However, the research on magnet hospital is still relative limited and needs to be paid more attention, especially in developing countries. Impact This study showed the most contributed countries, journals, institutions, authors and the main themes related to magnet hospital, which would help researchers find potential partners, optimize and deepen future research, such as enhancing the magnet hospital research in developing countries, improving the evidence‐based research and considering the impact caused by different culture. Furthermore, this study can also give suggestions for magnet hospital policy makers.

show abstract

“…Bibliometrics has been used in certain aspects of the field of nursing, including nursing‐related research (Traynor et al., 2001), exceptional articles (Nicoll et al., 2018, 2020), nursing competences (Blazun et al., 2015), and clinical simulation (Kokol et al., 2017). Certain other aspects focus on the bibliometrics of qualitative research (Capilla‐Díaz et al., 2020) or selected journals (Giménez‐Espert & Prado‐Gascó, 2019; Železnik et al., 2017). Bibliometric analysis allows documentation of the dissemination of research to clinicians.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A bibliometric analysis of publication of funded studies in nursing research from Web of Science, 2008–2018

Zhu

Liu

et al. 2020

Journal of Advanced Nursing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim To analyse the current status and publication trends of funded studies in nursing‐related research from 2008 to 2018, available in the Web of Science. Design A longitudinal bibliometric analysis of publications of funded studies in nursing‐related research, obtained from the Web of Science, was conducted. Methods On 10 May 2019, we accessed 77,772 funded studies (2008–2018) from the Web of Science. Bibliometric methods and indicators were used to classify the publications and summarize the overall number, countries/regions, institutions, journals, and other parameters of the publications. Results The global output of nursing‐related funded research publications increased significantly over time. The three leading countries with the highest number of funded publications were the United States, Australia, and the United Kingdom, with the United States accounting for 15 of the top 20 institutions associated with funded publications, which mostly included institutions of higher education. The most common disciplines of these publications were oncology, psychiatry, and paediatrics. The top three journals that published the largest number of nursing‐related funded publications were the Journal of Clinical Nursing, the Journal of Advanced Nursing, and the International Journal of Nursing Studies. Keywords with the highest frequency of occurrence included “nurses,” “qualitative research,” “older people,” “quality of life,” “depression,” “cancer,” and “children.” Conclusions Nursing‐related research has been drawing increasing attention over the years. Analysing the output of funded publications and monitoring the new dynamics of the international development of academic research in the field of nursing are crucial for determining future directions of nursing‐related research development. Impact The results of this study will provide a reference for scholars to evaluate the current utilization efficiency of global nursing‐related research funding and demonstrate the development and trends in nursing‐related research.

show abstract

Bibliometric analysis of qualitative research on patients’ experiences of intestinal stoma published between 2002 ‐ 2018

Cited by 6 publications

References 26 publications

Trends in Research on Art Therapy Indexed in the Web of Science: A Bibliometric Analysis

Trends in Research on Art Therapy Indexed in the Web of Science: A Bibliometric Analysis

Research focus and thematic trends in magnet hospital research: A bibliometric analysis of the global publications

A bibliometric analysis of publication of funded studies in nursing research from Web of Science, 2008–2018

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About