Bibliometric analysis of the international literature on open innovation and absorptive capacity

Seguí‐Mas, Elies; Signes-Pérez, Elisa; Sarrión-Viñes, Faustino; Alegre, Joaquı́n

doi:10.3926/ic.685

Cited by 8 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 28 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…There are many bibliometric studies of a wide variety of issues. For example, solar energy technologies and open innovation (De Paulo & Porto, 2017), the supply chain of renewable energy (Azevedo et al, 2019), sustainability in the collaborative economy (Ertz, 2018), open innovation and absorptive capacity (Seguí-Mas et al, 2016).…”

Section: Data Source and Proceduresmentioning

confidence: 99%

A bibliometric study of sustainable technology research

Akbari

Khodayari

Danesh

et al. 2020

Cogent Business & Management

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Sustainable technology is a rather new subject in sustainability which is paying academics' attention recently. This article provides a bibliometric review of sustainable technology studies in the sustainability area. Data from the Web of Science (WoS), database relating to 1122 publications available between 1970 and 2019 is used. Numerous bibliometric methods are used to do this indication. The VOSviewer software is used to graph the bibliographic documents. The findings revealed that publications around this area have been enhanced considerably in the last decade and the USA is the most dominant country. Furthermore, the co-citation network of references revealed five clusters; the competitive advantage of environmental innovation, the development of sustainable technologies, environmental policy tools, undesirable output solutions, and innovative environmental activities.

show abstract

Section: Data Source and Proceduresmentioning

confidence: 99%

A bibliometric study of sustainable technology research

Akbari

Khodayari

Danesh

et al. 2020

Cogent Business & Management

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Although a static visual inspection of the networks is useful and common to understand the relational behavior among authors (Kalemba & Campa-Planas, 2017;Seguí-Mas, Signes-Pérez, et al, 2016;Shi & Li, 2019), we analyzed how the properties of the co-authorship network evolve over time and provide an interpretation to understand the longitudinal dynamics of co-authorships (Arias et al, 2016).…”

Section: Bibliometric Indicators Used In This Studymentioning

confidence: 99%

Analysis and categorization of studies of digital marketing in small and medium enterprises

Cadavid

Arias

2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose: To analyze and categorize the scientific production in the field of digital marketing in small and medium enterprises.Design/methodology/approach: We retrieved the bibliographic information of 294 publications in this field indexed in Scopus and employed technology-mining techniques and cluster analysis of keywords to gain insight into the most relevant trends in this research area. We conducted a keyword cleaning process to remove ambiguity, synonyms, and obvious results and employed our own Python scripts and the Bibliometrix package in the R programming language for the calculations.Findings: Our results paint a broad picture of this research area, highlighting its most important journals, countries, researchers, and keywords, as well as their interactions. We also identified and explained five thematic clusters: electronic commerce, social media, specific social media, internationalization, and brand. We found that social media, big data, search engine optimization, advertisement, internationalization, websites, and Facebook are hot research topics in this field. Originality/value: This study offers updated information on the trends of the scientific production in said research field, covering a time window that goes up to the year 2021. This is beyond any traditional bibliometric analysis, and it reveals the structure of the knowledge in the field. This paper can be used as a reference point to define a future research agenda in this area.

show abstract

“…Within the scientific environment linked to OI, several authors have opted for different bibliometric techniques to study the OI concept from different approaches, such as Kovàcs et al [29], Randhawa et al [27], de Paulo et al [30], Ebrahim and Bong [31], Lopes and de Carvalho [32], Le et al [33], Aziz et al [34] and Gao et al [28]. However, these techniques have also been used to analyze the OI environment from other perspectives, such as small and medium-sized enterprises by Odriozola-Fernández et al [35], large firms by Noviaristanti [36], absorptive capacity by Segui-Mas et al [37], sustainable tourism by Della Corte et al [38] and its relationship with solar energy technologies by Paulo and Porto [23]. Regarding the research carried out in the field of knowledge transfer or sharing using bibliometric techniques, Naushad Ali et al [39] present a bibliometric analysis about knowledge sharing in general from 1990 to 2016, offering an overview of trending publications, journals, countries and organizations.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Knowledge Sharing and Transfer in an Open Innovation Context: Mapping Scientific Evolution

Álvarez-Meaza

Pikatza-Gorrotxategi

Belver

2020

Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The essence of innovation lies in knowledge, which is why open innovation opens the door to knowledge transfer with agents outside the organization. In order to comprehend the joint scientific trajectory of these two areas of knowledge, the aim of this study is to identify and analyze the main indicators of scientific behavior involved in the research field related to the link between open innovation and knowledge transfer or knowledge sharing concepts through bibliometric and network analysis. The results show clear European leadership in scientific production developed in universities. In addition, the high quality of the main sources of diffusion infers publications of good scientific quality. The most recognized source of knowledge used in new research is directed towards university-company relationships in an open innovation environment. Network analysis related to keywords has allowed us to define the most interesting, relevant fields of research, highlighting the importance acquired by topics such as ‘communication’, ‘inter-organizational context’ and ‘education’, to better focus on future research of the scientific community. It can be concluded that the scientific development of both concepts is an active field in the academic community, and also, that new key terms appear, opening new paths of research.

show abstract

Bibliometric analysis of the international literature on open innovation and absorptive capacity

Cited by 8 publications

References 28 publications

A bibliometric study of sustainable technology research

A bibliometric study of sustainable technology research

Analysis and categorization of studies of digital marketing in small and medium enterprises

Knowledge Sharing and Transfer in an Open Innovation Context: Mapping Scientific Evolution

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About