2022
DOI: 10.3390/su142416388
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bibliometric Analysis of the Scientific Research on Sustainability in the Impact of Social Media on Higher Education during the COVID-19 Pandemic

Abstract: The COVID-19 pandemic has created massive issues around the world. To ensure that education continued during the crisis, educational institutions had to implement a variety of initiatives. This paper aims to examine the growth and country collaboration on social media (SM) research during the COVID-19 pandemic through a systematic review and investigate the impact of this body of work by citation and network analyses. The number of articles, keywords, and clusters of worldwide academic scholars working in the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 2 , 66 , 67 , 78 These findings are congruent with those discussed in the study of Babbar and Gupta 79 where the authors highlighted that poor internet infrastructure and connectivity, unavailability of proper equipment and devices, and the unpreparedness of the academic institutions are among the main reasons why a transformation to digital and online learning during the pandemic was difficult, especially for developing countries such as India, Bangladesh, Jordan, Nepal, South Africa, and more. Another study by Hossain et al., 80 also confirms this point where it was proven through a bibliometric analysis that digital divide is among the main challenges related to DSM integration within HEIs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“… 2 , 66 , 67 , 78 These findings are congruent with those discussed in the study of Babbar and Gupta 79 where the authors highlighted that poor internet infrastructure and connectivity, unavailability of proper equipment and devices, and the unpreparedness of the academic institutions are among the main reasons why a transformation to digital and online learning during the pandemic was difficult, especially for developing countries such as India, Bangladesh, Jordan, Nepal, South Africa, and more. Another study by Hossain et al., 80 also confirms this point where it was proven through a bibliometric analysis that digital divide is among the main challenges related to DSM integration within HEIs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…It matters very much whether the information makes sense to a person, and the value of information also largely depends on how it hits the emotional component of a person (Kobylarek et al 2022;Hlad et al 2022). Young people belonging to Generation Z, who are used to being recipients of much diverse information since their childhood, live in an age in which one of the powers able to provide both the information itself and the emotion embedded into it, is the media (Hossain et al 2022). The media as known by Generation Z is highly influential in shaping not only judgments but also values and both individual and collective decisions ( Čerget'ová Tomanová et al 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Citation links, bibliographic coupling, and co-occurrence analysis allow researchers to obtain the themes or clusters used in the titles and abstracts of countries, institutions, and published papers [41]. The software is widely used in bibliometric studies for analysis in different fields such as geography [42], agriculture [43], knowledge management [39], and education [44]. Therefore, in this study, VOSviewer (version 1.6.18) software is used as the main metric tool to visualize and analyze the key hotspots and development evolution of nudge research in the form of knowledge graphs with Network Visualization, Overlay Visualization, and Density Visualization presenting its keyword co-occurrence and literature co-citations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%