2018
DOI: 10.3389/frma.2018.00034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bibliometric and Altmetric Analysis of Three Social Science Disciplines

Abstract: This article analyses scientific publications of international prestige in three social science disciplines (communication, economics, and sociology) to identify possible production patterns. Emphasis is placed on the study of impact and visibility, both through bibliometric and altmetric indicators to determine similarities and differences and to establish possible inter-variable relationships. The use of measures such as the presence in social media for the study of the visibility of documents is discussed. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In other fields, such as plant science, the percentages observed stand at around 31% and in communication up to 43%. Some earlier studies analysing the impact of all disciplines in social media reported that the percentage of papers with altmetric indicators normally ranges from 15% to 24%, with social sciences and humanities exhibiting the highest values [70]. Around 21% of the articles on energy savings have been observed to be present in social media [64], a value consistent with earlier data on the overall impact of papers listed in the Web of Science [62].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…In other fields, such as plant science, the percentages observed stand at around 31% and in communication up to 43%. Some earlier studies analysing the impact of all disciplines in social media reported that the percentage of papers with altmetric indicators normally ranges from 15% to 24%, with social sciences and humanities exhibiting the highest values [70]. Around 21% of the articles on energy savings have been observed to be present in social media [64], a value consistent with earlier data on the overall impact of papers listed in the Web of Science [62].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…It may be useful to take into consideration not only differences and developments in article coverage between STM and the SSH, but also between individual SSH disciplines or clusters of disciplines when applying bibliometrics and determining methods for assessing research impact in evaluation systems. Such considerations correspond with De Filippo and Sanz-Casado’s [ 37 ] findings for three social science disciplines based on an analysis of publication activity, collaboration, impact, and visibility using both traditional and alternative metrics.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Today many content sharing sites such as fora, blogs and social networks (including Facebook and Twitter) have not only proven very popular among the public at large, but have also seduced members of the scientific community, giving rise to the so-called "academic social web". This new space enables researchers to share and validate their projects through tools tailored to academia, such as reference management software (Mendeley, CiteULike), professional networks (ResearchGate, ScienceOpen) and digital identity applications (Web of Science's ResearcherID or ORCID) [31].…”
Section: The Challenges Facing Open Sciencementioning
confidence: 99%