Bibliometric and bibliographical research in Translation Studies

Rovira-Esteva, Sara; Orero, Pilar; Aixelá, Javier Franco

doi:10.1080/0907676x.2015.1026361

Cited by 29 publications

(14 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Rovira-Esteva et al (2015) in the introduction to the monograph Bibliometric Studies and Bibliographic Research in Translation Studies states that "in 2015 there were over 110 living specialized journals in Translation and Interpreting Studies (T&IS), a few dictionaries and encyclopedias dealing only with this discipline, and more than 60,000 items of scientific publications, with over 40,000 in the last 20 years. "…”

Section: Intercultural Communication In the 21mentioning

confidence: 99%

Research Tendencies in Translation and Interpreting Studies and Intercultural Communication

Garcés¹

2018

IJL

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The rise of globalization, the strengthening of multicultural societies, the abolishment of borders, technological advances, social networks, and the increasing political power of economic forces are all unmistakable occurrences that are characteristic of the 21st century. Communication within these multilingual societies comes across new developments and challenges that inevitably modify each type of intervention. All these issues are subjects of growing interest within the scope of research and training in Translation and Interpreting Studies and intercultural communication. This article focuses on some of these issues. First, the author will briefly write about some overarching themes in Translation and Interpreting Studies (T&IS). This will be followed by an overview of the influence of some disciplines. After that, some tendencies in research methods used in T&IS will be explore. Finally, an example of crossing domains in research and practice in T&IS in the 21 st century will be presented taking as an example the Master Thesis from the MA in Intercultural Communication, Public Service Interpreting and Translation (Chinese-Spanish) offered at

show abstract

Section: Intercultural Communication In the 21mentioning

confidence: 99%

Research Tendencies in Translation and Interpreting Studies and Intercultural Communication

Garcés¹

2018

IJL

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…One way of investigating ILSA research is to examine its output in terms of books, journal articles and other kinds of publications. We are especially interested in, and therefore limit our investigation to, scientific journals, because they function as the new research currency (Rovira-Esteva et al, 2015). Our analysis is conducted on a number of articles, based on PISA data, investigating the organisation and legitimisation of knowledge.…”

Section: Scientific Knowledge Production and Ilsa Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%

A game of thrones: Organising and legitimising knowledge through PISA research

Mølstad

Pettersson

Forsberg

2017

European Educational Research Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study investigates knowledge structures and scientific communication using bibliometric methods to explore scientific knowledge production and dissemination. The aim is to develop knowledge about this growing field by investigating studies using international large-scale assessment (ILSA) data, with a specific focus on those using Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) data. As international organisations use ILSA to measure, assess and compare the success of national education systems, it is important to study this specific knowledge to understand how it is organised and legitimised within research. The findings show an interchange of legitimisation, where major actors from the USA and other English-speaking and westernised countries determine the academic discourse. Important epistemic cultures for PISA research are identified: the most important of which are situated within psychology and education. These two research environments are epicentres created by patterns of the referrals to and referencing of articles framing the formulation of PISA knowledge. Finally, it is argued that this particular PISA research is self-referential and self-authorising, which raises questions about whether research accountability leads to ‘a game of thrones’, where rivalry going on within the scientific field concerning how and on what grounds ‘facts’ and ‘truths’ are constructed, as a continuing process with no obvious winner.

show abstract

“…Tal cantidad de documentos disponibles ha llevado a algunos desde hace algún tiempo (Franco Aixelá, 2001, 2003a, 2003bGile, 2000;Pöchhacker, 1995aPöchhacker, , 1995b) y a otros más recientemente (Franco Aixelá, 2010a, 2010b, 2010c, 2013Li, 2015;Martínez-Gómez, 2015;Rovira-Esteva y Orero Clavero, 2011Rovira-Esteva et al, 2015;Yan, Pan, Wu, y Wang, 2013;Zhang, Pan, Chen, y Luo, 2015) a plantearse la necesidad de abordar la construcción de representaciones que den cuenta del desarrollo de la disciplina con cierto grado de precisión. Dichas iniciativas -de carácter bibliométrico y centradas sobre todo en los un estudio bibliométrico de la producción publicada en revistas con filiación hispanoamericana…”

Section: Introductionunclassified

Los estudios de traducción en Hispanoamérica: un estudio bibliométrico de la producción publicada en revistas con filiación hispanoamericana

Gómez

2017

Mutatis Mutandis

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Bibliometric and bibliographical research in Translation Studies

Cited by 29 publications

References 0 publications

Research Tendencies in Translation and Interpreting Studies and Intercultural Communication

Research Tendencies in Translation and Interpreting Studies and Intercultural Communication

A game of thrones: Organising and legitimising knowledge through PISA research

Los estudios de traducción en Hispanoamérica: un estudio bibliométrico de la producción publicada en revistas con filiación hispanoamericana

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About