Carbon nanohorns (CNH), other carbon
particles (OCP), fine fractions
of other carbon particles (OCPf), carbon nanotubes (CNT),
and γ-alumina (γ-Al2O3) were utilized
as support materials for the Ni–Mo catalyst in this study to
test the influence of the support on hydrotreating efficiency using
light gas oil (LGO) and identify the cause of disparity in activity
from these various catalyst supports. OCP and OCPf are
the main byproducts obtained during the production of CNH. The influence
of the support on the hydrotreating catalyst is significant and includes
enhancement of textural properties, active phase dispersion, and catalyst
reducibility. The hydrodenitrogenation activities of all of the different
supported catalysts with light gas oil are presented and correlated
with their physicochemical properties. Among all of the carbon-supported
catalysts used, the NiMo/CNH catalyst exhibited outstanding physicochemical
properties, and as such, its hydrodesulfurization activity of 89%
dominated that of NiMo/OCPf (78%), NiMo/OCP (67%), and
NiMo/CNT (73%) catalysts. The pore volume, pore diameter, and surface
area of the NiMo/CNH catalyst was 0.42 cm3/g, 10.9 nm,
and 350 m2/g, respectively. The percentage metal dispersion
of the NiMo/CNH catalyst was 8.0% and was about twice that of the
NiMo/OCPf and NiMo/CNT catalysts. X-ray absorption spectroscopy
(XAS) analysis confirmed that the carbon-supported catalysts exhibited
a distorted octahedral Mo coordination environment, whereas the NiMo/γ-Al2O3 catalyst exhibited a mixture of octahedral and
tetrahedral Mo environment. From XAS results, it was apparent that
the possession of a Mo octahedral coordination environment does not
always translate to attainment of highest hydrodesulfurization (HDS)
and hydrodenitrogenation (HDN) activities.