2024
DOI: 10.1016/j.eng.2023.05.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Big Geodata Reveals Spatial Patterns of Built Environment Stocks Across and Within Cities in China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
1

Year Published

2024
2024
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
0
8
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, the dataset developed by Huang, et al . 6 which is gridded based on bottom-up machine learning estimates, displayed a greater divergence from our results, with a 29% difference in total materials in buildings at the prefectural level. Furthermore, we compared and assessed the gridded performance of our results from Huang, et al .…”
Section: Technical Validationcontrasting
confidence: 96%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In contrast, the dataset developed by Huang, et al . 6 which is gridded based on bottom-up machine learning estimates, displayed a greater divergence from our results, with a 29% difference in total materials in buildings at the prefectural level. Furthermore, we compared and assessed the gridded performance of our results from Huang, et al .…”
Section: Technical Validationcontrasting
confidence: 96%
“…Thus, gaining a comprehensive understanding of the spatial distribution of material stocks has become crucial for the effective implementation of resource management policies and offers valuable insights for the promotion of sustainable development patterns in urban entities. Previous research on material flows in China has evolved from a national-level accounting to provincial 3 , city-level 4 , and even grid-level analyses 5 , 6 . Nevertheless, the absence of standardized methodologies has hindered a precise quantification and localization of provincial-level and city-level material stock accounts down to the level of individual urban grids.…”
Section: Background and Summarymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations