2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-25662-3_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bilateral Positive Integration: Different Strategies for Regulatory Cooperation in the TTIP

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We draw heavily on the literature (Fiorini et al, 2017; Marx & Wouters, 2014; Wieck & Rudloff, 2020) to define key coordination strategies that SS systems, government, and international organizations follow to cooperate (Figure 2).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We draw heavily on the literature (Fiorini et al, 2017; Marx & Wouters, 2014; Wieck & Rudloff, 2020) to define key coordination strategies that SS systems, government, and international organizations follow to cooperate (Figure 2).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We borrow the dissimilarity indices from the literature about regulatory heterogeneity across countries (Burnquist et al, 2011; Drogué & DeMaria, 2010; Li & Beghin, 2014; Rau et al, 2010; Vigani et al, 2012; Winchester et al, 2012) to measure the overlap and the competition across the SS. Furthermore, to assess cooperation in the standard market, we design a qualitative matrix that shows how SS schemes, governments and international organizations pursue different levels of cooperation strategies (Fiorini et al, 2017; Marx & Wouters, 2014; Wieck & Rudloff, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Defined by Hooker (1999) as “rapprochement,” the regulatory cooperation between trading partners consists in actions (e.g., mutual recognition of standards, harmonization of standards) aimed at eliminating, reducing, and preventing regulatory differences between them. The rapprochement is supportive of a positive integration of countries at the regional level (i.e., in the context of RTAs) (Wieck & Rudloff, 2020). Through the regulatory cooperation, the RTAs may enhance trade between signatories but may also divert trade from non‐signatory countries (Grant, 2013).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other examples include Non‐centrifuged dehydrated sugar cane juice , discontinued in 2019 after several years of discussion; MRLs for Bovine Somatotropin (BST) and Zilpateral which have been on the agenda since 1998 and 2012, respectively; and a ML for methylmercury in amberjack and swordfish discontinued in 2018 because of low levels of concentration and lack of consensus. Finally, there are other prominent examples of food safety issues that continue to plague governments and trade negotiators in high‐income markets such as the US and EU, despite the existence of Codex standards and guidance (Wieck and Rudloff, 2020). As Josling and Tangermann (2016) note: ‘… the issue of [EU] banning so‐called “chlorine chicken” is now one of the battle cries of those in the EU opposed to the TTIP’ (p. 3).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%