2008
DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.1290-08.2008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bilateral Speech Comprehension Reflects Differential Sensitivity to Spectral and Temporal Features

Abstract: Speech comprehension has been shown to be a strikingly bilateral process, but the differential contributions of the subfields of left and right auditory cortices have remained elusive. The hypothesis that left auditory areas engage predominantly in decoding fast temporal perturbations of a signal whereas the right areas are relatively more driven by changes of the frequency spectrum has not been directly tested in speech or music. This brain-imaging study independently manipulated the speech signal itself alon… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

30
187
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 187 publications
(217 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
30
187
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in Fig. 4A, increasing sensory detail again resulted in an increased MEG response at 200-800 ms, similar to our previous MEG observations for this manipulation during clarityrating tasks (23) and for hemodynamic studies that used either clarity-rating (39,40) or speech-recognition tasks (22,24,41).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…As shown in Fig. 4A, increasing sensory detail again resulted in an increased MEG response at 200-800 ms, similar to our previous MEG observations for this manipulation during clarityrating tasks (23) and for hemodynamic studies that used either clarity-rating (39,40) or speech-recognition tasks (22,24,41).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…From the functional point of view, several neuroimaging studies have pointed to asymmetries in the temporal cortices, especially in language-related tasks. The right and left auditory cortices have been suggested to be predominantly sensitive to spectral and temporal changes, respectively (Zatorre and Belin, 2001;Obleser et al, 2008), with the right auditory cortex having a more constrained computational role (Obleser et al, 2008). Furthermore, the left-hemispheric responses are affected by linguistic background, in a gender-related manner (Salmelin et al, 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, comparisons between studies of spontaneous activity in the absence of experimental acoustic input and the temporal structure of stimuli producing the greatest regional activity need to be made with caution. A recent study (Obleser et al, 2008) that manipulated the spectral and temporal resolution within degraded speech stimuli and found corresponding differential engagement of right and left auditory association cortex, respectively, points to the importance of the interplay of both temporal and spectral information.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, others demonstrated sensitivity to decreasing time windows in left HG, but no differential temporal sensitivity in AAC (Zatorre and Belin, 2001;Schönwiesner et al, 2005). Obleser et al (2008) manipulated the spectral and temporal resolution of natural speech signals, demonstrating slight lateralization preferences in right and left AAC (specifically STS) for spectral and temporal resolution, respectively. Thus, critical yet unresolved questions relate to (1) the extent to which the analysis of different levels of temporal structure depends on PAC and SAC as opposed to AAC, and (2) the lateralization of temporal analysis within these different areas (Hickok and Poeppel, 2007;Zatorre and Gandour, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%