1984
DOI: 10.1002/jso.2930260416
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biliary and duodenal bypass for carcinoma of the head of the pancreas

Abstract: A review was undertaken of 66 patients having palliative bypass surgery for carcinoma of the head of the pancreas. A second laparotomy for relief of duodenal obstruction was necessary in six of 29 (20%) of the patients who did not have gastroenterostomy performed initially, but late gastric outlet obstruction occurred only once in 37 patients having an initial gastroenterostomy (P less than 0.05). Cholecystojejunostomy failed to provide permanent biliary bypass in 14 of 53 (26%) patients, compared to successfu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

1987
1987
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[9] In addition, results from multiple surgical series on cholecystojejunostomy demonstrated that the overall rate of recurrent biliary obstruction of 8%–48%. [101112] Thus, in patients with failed ERCP, EUS-guided biliary drainage should still be the first option, and in cases where EUS-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) is not possible, then EUS-GBD can be considered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[9] In addition, results from multiple surgical series on cholecystojejunostomy demonstrated that the overall rate of recurrent biliary obstruction of 8%–48%. [101112] Thus, in patients with failed ERCP, EUS-guided biliary drainage should still be the first option, and in cases where EUS-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) is not possible, then EUS-GBD can be considered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For palliation of unresectable cancer, a French multicentre study by Huguier and co‐workers15, 16 and an American study by Neuberger and colleagues17 supported a combined biliary and gastric bypass because of the higher incidence of reoperative gastric bypasses in the group undergoing biliary bypass placement alone and an equal mortality rate in the double bypass group. This approach is supported by several other studies18–23. On the other hand, de Rooij and co‐workers23 and Egrari and O'Connell24 proposed selective reoperation for obstruction.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…Huguier et al and Neuberger et al recommended simultaneous biliary and enteral bypasses on the basis of comparable mortality (single versus double bypass), but found an increased need for gastric bypass at a later date (when most patients' physical condition has deteriorated) in patients who initially only received biliary drainage [39,40]. This approach is supported by the results of several other studies [41-44]. On the contrary, other authors emphasize in particular the selective aspect of performing a double bypass in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.…”
Section: Prophylactic Double Bypass and The Importance Of Palliative mentioning
confidence: 89%