2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2021.09.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biliopancreatic access following anatomy-altering bariatric surgery: a literature review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…TGERCP provides the advantage of using a standing side-viewing duodenoscope, however, the angle of the papilla may be altered considering the patient is in a supine position. Also, if clinically indicated, a gastrostomy tube can be left in place for future access to the pancreaticobiliary system 23. Disadvantages of a Transgastric endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography include wound site infections (15% of cases), an overall adverse event rate of 20%, and an average operating room time of 2.5 hours 24.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…TGERCP provides the advantage of using a standing side-viewing duodenoscope, however, the angle of the papilla may be altered considering the patient is in a supine position. Also, if clinically indicated, a gastrostomy tube can be left in place for future access to the pancreaticobiliary system 23. Disadvantages of a Transgastric endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography include wound site infections (15% of cases), an overall adverse event rate of 20%, and an average operating room time of 2.5 hours 24.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, if clinically indicated, a gastrostomy tube can be left in place for future access to the pancreaticobiliary system. 23 Disadvantages of a Transgastric endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography include wound site infections (15% of cases), an overall adverse event rate of 20%, and an average operating room time of 2.5 hours. 24 An additional drawback of TGERCP is the difficulty associated with coordinating both a surgical and gastroenterology teams.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, the tube is removed, and the tract is dilated with a balloon to an extent that will allow the passage of the duodenoscope. After completion of the dilation of the tract, ERCP can be repeatedly performed[ 7 ]. Given the wide availability of gastrostomy tubes, we believe that the abovementioned technique has particular value for the clinicians involved in the management of bariatric patients and should be supplemented in this review.…”
Section: To the Editormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3][4][5][6] The rate of patients who develop cholelithiasis following bariatric surgery is around 30% 3,7 and roughly 10% of these patients will develop symptomatic gallbladder disease. [3][4][5] Patients who undergo bariatric surgery are at a higher risk of developing gallstones due to a variety of factors including changes in metabolism, leading to higher levels of cholesterol in bile, slower rates of gallbladder emptying, and an increase of mucin in the bile following bariatric surgery. 5 Roughly 5% to 15% of patients undergoing cholecystectomy will have choledocholithiasis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 When a patient develops choledocholithiasis, surgical interventions utilize endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) to virtualize the biliary tract to remove the obstruction. 3 Patients who have had bariatric surgery face an anatomic obstacle to performing an ERCP. The proximal anatomy is altered in patients with a Roux-En-Y gastric bypass, which increases the length of the small bowel that must be traversed to access the ampulla of Vader with ERCP.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%