2015
DOI: 10.1016/s2212-5671(15)00165-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

BIM Implementation and Organisational Change: A Case Study of a Large Swedish Public Client

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A number of authors discussed BIM implementation as a technology and a combination between software knowledge and skills (Miettinen & Paavola, 2014) while others see that investing in IT infrastructure with education and training is a key factor (Lindblad & Vass, 2015). On the other hand, some researchers see change management and elaborating new business models as critical factors for BIM adoption (Lizhu, 2017;Miettinen & Paavola, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of authors discussed BIM implementation as a technology and a combination between software knowledge and skills (Miettinen & Paavola, 2014) while others see that investing in IT infrastructure with education and training is a key factor (Lindblad & Vass, 2015). On the other hand, some researchers see change management and elaborating new business models as critical factors for BIM adoption (Lizhu, 2017;Miettinen & Paavola, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2015, Lindblad and Vass [35] investigated the changes, in three areas of product (model), organization (resources) and process (work practices), required for BIM implementation initiating in a large public infrastructure organization in Sweden. Furthermore, Son et al (2015) [36] studied the drivers of BIM adoption in design organizations of AEC industry aiming to examine the factors enabling the adoption process by the architects.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Order of subjects is according to authors' opinions on the importance of subjects and different from the frequency of appearances on the articles. [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [7], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21] Cultural [22], [23], [2], [24], [10], [11], [12], [13], [25], [8], [16], [26], [17], [27], [28], [29], [ 30] Management [31], [1], [32], [12], [33], [15], [34], [35], [36], [17], [37], [38], [39], [40], [41] Financial [22], [11], [12], [13],…”
Section: Bim Implementation Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%