2011
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201117552
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bimodality of light and s-elements in M4 (NGC 6121)

Abstract: Context. All globular clusters (GCs) studied in detail host two or more populations of stars (the multiple population phenomenon). Theoretical models suggest that the second population is formed from gas polluted by processed material produced by massive stars of the first generation. However the nature of the polluters is matter of strong debate. Several candidates have been proposed: massive main-sequence stars (fast rotating or binaries), intermediate-mass AGB stars, or SNeII. Aims. We studied red giant bra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
66
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
13
66
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The observations of the simultaneous, significant variation in the Na content might pose a problem to the viability of such models for M 4. Notice, however, that the recent results by Villanova & Geisler (2011) support FRMS as likely polluters from which the second generation of stars formed in M 4 (see also Yong et al 2008;Lind et al 2011). Figure 2 shows another remarkable fact: there is one star, # 37934, that displays a lithium abundance, which is significantly higher than that of the others.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…The observations of the simultaneous, significant variation in the Na content might pose a problem to the viability of such models for M 4. Notice, however, that the recent results by Villanova & Geisler (2011) support FRMS as likely polluters from which the second generation of stars formed in M 4 (see also Yong et al 2008;Lind et al 2011). Figure 2 shows another remarkable fact: there is one star, # 37934, that displays a lithium abundance, which is significantly higher than that of the others.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…This is a small value, comparable with the typical measurement error of any chemical abundance determination procedure (e.g., Villanova et al 2011), so we can assume that any intrinsic spread in CNO (at a given metallicity), if present at all, is negligible. A more straightforward procedure would be a direct calculation of the measurement error on the [C+N+O/Fe] quantity, which depends on the error on the temperature, gravity, metallicity, microturbulence, and S/N, but this is out of the scope of this paper.…”
Section: The Age Spread and The Age-metallicity Relationmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Among all the other Galactic GCs with secure evidence of multiple stellar populations, M4 is the least massive one with a metallicity comparable to that of NGC 6362 (Harris 1996(Harris , 2010Marino et al 2008;Carretta et al 2009;Villanova & Geisler 2011). Hence, a comparison between these two clusters could yield particularly interesting information, and, by following the approach described in Mucciarelli et al (2013a), we therefore adopted the same technique described above to perform the chemical analysis of a sample of stars in M4.…”
Section: Comparison With M4mentioning
confidence: 99%