2020
DOI: 10.3390/galaxies8020028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Binary Central Stars of Planetary Nebulae

Abstract: It is now clear that central star binarity plays a key role in the formation and evolution of planetary nebulae, with a significant fraction playing host to close-binary central stars which have survived one or more common envelope episodes. Recent studies of these systems have revealed many surprises which place important constraints on the common envelope -a critical phase in the formation of a wide variety of astrophysical phenomena, including the cosmologically important supernovae type ia and other transi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although these abundances have been revised downward [54,55], the enhanced Rb abundances combined with a lack of Zr enrichment indicate that s-process neutrons are produced by α-captures onto 22 Ne in these stars. The 22 Ne source results in higher neutron densities than the 13 C source, leading to branchings in the s-process path that preferentially The discussion in this review has thus far neglected the role of binary PN progenitor stars, but this cannot be ignored since binary interactions likely play a role in the formation and shaping of a significant fraction of PNe [e.g., [56][57][58], and can affect their chemical compositions [e.g., 59]. For sufficiently close binaries, Roche lobe overflow can lead to common envelope (CE) evolution and the truncation of the AGB [9,60].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although these abundances have been revised downward [54,55], the enhanced Rb abundances combined with a lack of Zr enrichment indicate that s-process neutrons are produced by α-captures onto 22 Ne in these stars. The 22 Ne source results in higher neutron densities than the 13 C source, leading to branchings in the s-process path that preferentially The discussion in this review has thus far neglected the role of binary PN progenitor stars, but this cannot be ignored since binary interactions likely play a role in the formation and shaping of a significant fraction of PNe [e.g., [56][57][58], and can affect their chemical compositions [e.g., 59]. For sufficiently close binaries, Roche lobe overflow can lead to common envelope (CE) evolution and the truncation of the AGB [9,60].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many bipolar and elliptical planetary nebulae (PNe; including some post-asymptotic giant branch nebulae) with central binary systems (e.g., Miszalski et al 2019;Orosz et al 2019;Jones 2020). The morphologies of many of these nebulae suggest that a main sequence companion accretes mass from the asymptotic giant branch (AGB) progenitor of the PN and launches jets that shape the PN (e.g., Morris 1987;Soker 1990;Sahai & Trauger 1998;Rechy-García et al 2017;Akashi & Soker 2018;Balick et al 2019;Derlopa et al 2019;Estrella-Trujillo et al 2019;Tafoya et al 2019;Balick et al 2020;Rechy-García et al 2020; for an alternative view for some bipolar PNe see, e.g., Baan et al 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this phase, mass transfer between both stars is produced either by stellar winds or by Roche-lobe overflow. According to Jones (2020) approximately 12-20 % of PNe host a post CE system, and in such systems it has been hypothesised that the ingestion of the companion can lead to the bipolar ejection of the progenitor envelope, strongly affecting the PN morphology. Other authors propose that more distant binary companions may provide an alternative mechanism for the formation of highly aspherical morphologies by influencing the direction of collimated winds from the parent star, whose axis of rotation precesses due to the influence of a companion that is not necessarily close (Garcia-Segura 1997, see discussion in Sahai & Trauger 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%