“…This positive value for the chemical shift is surprising, since one would expect bonding effects to weaken the bond, leading to a negative chemical shift. Indeed, the experimental evidence on copper carbonyls [90] suggests a chemical shift of about -160 cm~.The conclusion we draw from this is not that the electromagnetic contribution to the shift is absent, but that the observed width is probably due to inhomogeneous broadening, corresponding to CO adsorbed on a variety of sites on the metal surface. In addition, the bonding in CO adsorbed on copper is probably much different from that in copper carbonyls.…”