2000
DOI: 10.1086/309393
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Binary Microlensing Events from the MACHO Project

Abstract: We present the lightcurves of 21 gravitational microlensing events from the first six years of the MACHO Project gravitational microlensing survey which are likely examples of lensing by binary systems. These events were manually selected from a total sample of ~350 candidate microlensing events which were either detected by the MACHO Alert System or discovered through retrospective analyses of the MACHO database. At least 14 of these 21 events exhibit strong (caustic) features, and 4 of the events are well fi… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
120
2

Year Published

2002
2002
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(128 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
6
120
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, MACHO-LMC-14 is known to be due to selflensing (Alcock et al 2001c) because it has a binary source and the form of the accompanying deformation of the lightcurve with respect to the simple microlensing lightcurve requires that the lens be in the LMC. A second event, MACHO-LMC-9, is due to a binary lens and the self-lensing interpretation can be avoided only by assuming that the source is also a binary system and that each of the two widely separated components happened to land on the caustic on the two successive observations made of the caustic entrance (Alcock et al 2000a).…”
Section: Discussion Of the Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, MACHO-LMC-14 is known to be due to selflensing (Alcock et al 2001c) because it has a binary source and the form of the accompanying deformation of the lightcurve with respect to the simple microlensing lightcurve requires that the lens be in the LMC. A second event, MACHO-LMC-9, is due to a binary lens and the self-lensing interpretation can be avoided only by assuming that the source is also a binary system and that each of the two widely separated components happened to land on the caustic on the two successive observations made of the caustic entrance (Alcock et al 2000a).…”
Section: Discussion Of the Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, this is exactly the mass range at which the MACHO project found microlensing effects towards the Large Megallenic Cloud (LMC). Indeed a reanalysis of the data including the estimated number of binary MACHO's (Alcock 2000b), suggests that the optical depth of these primordial black holes could be greater than first reported (Alcock 2000a). Thus it is possible that these primordial black holes, could account for a greater degree of the optical depth required to explain the galactic rotation curves.…”
Section: The Equation For the Solar Mass Horizon (M H ) Is Given By Tmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Of 21 light curves consistent with binary lenses analyzed by MACHO, two produced acceptable fits with companion masses as small 0.05M 0 (Alcock et al 2000). The first suggestion of possible planetary-mass lenses (Bennett et al 1997) came from MACHO survey data for MACHO 1994-BLG-4, which could be modelled as an M-dwarf/5M J pair, and MACHO 1995-BLG-3, a very short duration event modelled as an isolated 2MJ lens.…”
Section: Have Exoplanets Been Discovered With Microlensing?mentioning
confidence: 96%