2020 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/wcnc45663.2020.9120530
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Binary Power Optimality for Two Link Full-Duplex Network

Abstract: In this paper, we analyse the optimality of binary power allocation in a network that includes full-duplex communication links. Considering a network with four communicating nodes, two of them operating in half-duplex mode and the other two in full-duplex mode, we prove that binary power allocation is optimum for the full-duplex nodes when maximizing the sum rate. We also prove that, for half-duplex nodes binary power allocation is not optimum in general. However, for the two special cases, 1) the low signal-t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 24 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lower complexity scheduling algorithms are developed based on message-passing [40], SINR heuristics [41], [42], information-theoretic insights [43], [44], fractional programming [45], and machine learning approaches [46]- [48]. Binary power control is found to be optimal for sum-rate maximization in many cases, e.g., multiple access channels [49], 2user interference channels with single carrier [35], [36], [50] and multiple carriers [51], ๐พ-user one-sided symmetric Wyner-type interference channels [52], networks where the transmission rate is an artificial linear function of the received power [53], and networks where either a geometric-arithmetic mean or low-SINR approximation is applicable [36]. Remarkably, numerical simulations of common communication network topologies such as cellular networks and D2D networks [54]- [58] suggest that binary power control has performance comparable to optimal power control.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lower complexity scheduling algorithms are developed based on message-passing [40], SINR heuristics [41], [42], information-theoretic insights [43], [44], fractional programming [45], and machine learning approaches [46]- [48]. Binary power control is found to be optimal for sum-rate maximization in many cases, e.g., multiple access channels [49], 2user interference channels with single carrier [35], [36], [50] and multiple carriers [51], ๐พ-user one-sided symmetric Wyner-type interference channels [52], networks where the transmission rate is an artificial linear function of the received power [53], and networks where either a geometric-arithmetic mean or low-SINR approximation is applicable [36]. Remarkably, numerical simulations of common communication network topologies such as cellular networks and D2D networks [54]- [58] suggest that binary power control has performance comparable to optimal power control.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%