2019
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.9b08064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Binding Mechanism of Thrombin–Ligand Systems Investigated by a Polarized Protein-Specific Charge Force Field and Interaction Entropy Method

Abstract: In this study, 2 groups of 10 modified ligand systems with modified P3 and P2 side chains are used to study the binding mechanism with thrombin. Experimental results show that the binding affinity is enhanced by complex ligand side chains. The binding free energy obtained from the polarized protein-specific charge (PPC) force field combined with the newly developed interaction entropy (IE) method is consistent with the experimental values with a high correlation coefficient. On the contrary, poor correlation i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar findings have been repeatedly reported in the literature for a diverse set of systems: there is a large body of evidence that standard force fields with a fixed point charge model fail to describe H-bond strengths with sufficient accuracy for a variety of systems. [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27] This seems to apply also for the case of GGBP: in pilot simulations, we were unable to find a stable glucose bound state. The H-bonded network broke and set the glucose free, in contrast to the stable bound state found in experiment.…”
Section: Polarised Force Field For the Glucose Moleculementioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar findings have been repeatedly reported in the literature for a diverse set of systems: there is a large body of evidence that standard force fields with a fixed point charge model fail to describe H-bond strengths with sufficient accuracy for a variety of systems. [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27] This seems to apply also for the case of GGBP: in pilot simulations, we were unable to find a stable glucose bound state. The H-bonded network broke and set the glucose free, in contrast to the stable bound state found in experiment.…”
Section: Polarised Force Field For the Glucose Moleculementioning
confidence: 82%
“…The importance of polarisation effects on force field parameters, in particular on the force field charges was pointed out in several studies of protein-ligand binding, [20][21][22][23] peptide folding, 24,25 and protein-chromophore complexes. 26,27 Standard force field parameters, in particular the force field charges, can lead to structural instabilities or even a wrong description of the respective systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on these findings we are concerned about the use of less than 50 NMA calculations in some applications of MM-PBSA. [89][90][91] 4.3.3 Sampling and statistical error. Based on this study we recommend QM energy sampling at 50 snapshots.…”
Section: Convergence and Errorsmentioning
confidence: 99%