1980
DOI: 10.1042/bj1890255
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Binding of anhydrotrypsin to α2-macroglobulin

Abstract: Radiolabelled anhydrotrypsin was bound by alpha 2M (alpha 2-macroglobulin) sufficiently tightly to resist separation during gel electrophoresis; 2 mol of anhydrotrypsin were bound/mol of alpha 2M, but the interaction differed in important respects from that between active proteinases and alpha 2M. Anhydrotrypsin was bound by the electrophoretically 'fast' form of alpha 2M, although much less effectively than by the 'slow' form. The inactive enzyme was displaced from alpha 2M by trypsin inhibitor, the order of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Human TSG-6 was expressed and purified, also as described before (23,29). Anhydrotrypsin-Sepharose was prepared essentially as described previously (30,31). Protein concentrations were determined spectrophotometrically at 280 nm using theoretical extinction coefficients (GPMAW software, Lighthouse Data).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Human TSG-6 was expressed and purified, also as described before (23,29). Anhydrotrypsin-Sepharose was prepared essentially as described previously (30,31). Protein concentrations were determined spectrophotometrically at 280 nm using theoretical extinction coefficients (GPMAW software, Lighthouse Data).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Plasminogen (Deutsch and Mertz, 1970) and ␣ 2 M (Salvesen and Enghild, 1993) were purified as described previously. Anhydrotrypsin was prepared as described by Sayers and Barrett (1980).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pro-plasma CPB was unable to compete for binding to ␣ 2 M even at a 1000-fold molar excess confirming that the pro-plasma CPB component does not bind to ␣ 2 M. Similarly, no competition was observed using anhydrotrypsin as the competing ligand. Since it is known that anhydrotrypsin binds to ␣ 2 M (Sayers and Barrett, et al, 1980), the data suggest that plasma CPB and anhydrotrypsin bind to different sites on the ␣ 2 M molecule.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Elution was then begun with a linear gradient of 50-150mM NaCl in 50mM Tris/HCl buffer pH 7.5, and 7.5-m/ fractions were collected. Active fractions (numbers [34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42], which emerged at NaCl concentrations ranging from 60 to 80mM, were combined, and dialysed against 20mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 7.5, containing 0.14M NaCl. The dialysed fraction was then loaded to a nickel chelate column (1.2 χ 15 cm) which had been equilibrated with the same buffer.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%