1989
DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19890415)63:8<1583::aid-cncr2820630823>3.0.co;2-k
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Binding of soybean agglutinin lectin to prostatic hyperplasia and adenocarcinoma

Abstract: The binding of soybean agglutinin (SBA) lectin to routinely processed surgical pathology material from cases of prostatic hyperplasia, atypical hyperplasia, and adenocarcinoma was studied using an immunoperoxidase technique. Positive staining was obtained in eight of eight cases of nodular hyperplasia, eight of eight cases of atypical hyperplasia, and ten of 11 cases of adenocarcinoma. This report indicates that this lectin is not useful in distinguishing prostatic hyperplasia from adenocarcinoma.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…64 Another report indicated that SBA was not useful in distinguishing prostatic hyperplasia from an adenocarcinoma because positive staining was obtained in both of them. 65 Cytoagglutination or aggregation is one of the mechanisms used by lectins to interact with cancer cells. 66,67 Table 3 shows some examples of studies on the inhibitory effect of soybean lectin on malignant cells.…”
Section: Lectins: Structure Binding Speci Cities and Physiologic Efmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…64 Another report indicated that SBA was not useful in distinguishing prostatic hyperplasia from an adenocarcinoma because positive staining was obtained in both of them. 65 Cytoagglutination or aggregation is one of the mechanisms used by lectins to interact with cancer cells. 66,67 Table 3 shows some examples of studies on the inhibitory effect of soybean lectin on malignant cells.…”
Section: Lectins: Structure Binding Speci Cities and Physiologic Efmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These findings are consistent with the observations of previous lectin studies [6][7][8], except for McMahon et al [9] who found no staining with the lectins directed against fucosylated structures (UEA-1 and LTA), and Loy et al [10], McNeal & Alroy et al [11] and Drachenberg & Papadimitriou [12] who found no staining with DBA. These exceptions can be explained by understanding the possible biochemical pathway of the synthesis of The staining intensity of lectin reaction was graded as, ++++: very strong binding; +++: strong binding; ++: moderate binding; +: weak binding; -: negative staining.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Namely, SBA and UEA-I showed to be useful indicators of the prostate malignancy, as they distinguished between benign and malignant prostate cells, binding exclusively to dysplasic/carcinoma cells [ 24 , 27 , 28 ], or binding stronger to these cells, comparing to normal/hyperplasic cells binding [ 8 , 26 , 30 ]. However, in some studies SBA could not distinguish the referred cells [ 25 , 26 ]. In addition, the PNA lectin bound stronger to neoplasic cells than to normal and hyperplasic cells [ 8 , 17 , 26 , 27 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%