Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) emerged and rapidly spread worldwide. Several countries have imposed lockdown and isolation, in attempt to mitigate viral spread. However, social isolation has negative impact on psychological aspects, increasing stress, fear, anxiety, anger and emotional disturbance, as well as affecting sleep pattern and physical activity practice. Negative emotions and lifestyle changes trigger overeating, consequently affecting dietary practices. The present study aimed to verify the prevalence of lifestyle factors (i.e., sleep time/quality and physical exercise practice), eating behaviors dimensions, chronotype, and association with dietary practices (planning; domestic organization; food choice; ways of eating) in home confinement during the COVID-19 pandemic in São Paulo, Brazil. This cross-sectional study was conducted between April 27 and May 25, 2020. An anonymous online questionnaire (Microsoft Forms®) was used for data collection by the snowball method. We verified dietary practices (outcome), eating behavior, physical exercise practice, sleep quality and duration, chronotype (exposure variables). Sex, age, educational and social status were assessed as covariates and confounders. Seven hundred twenty-four (585 women and 139 men) were evaluated. Mean ± SD of age was 32.6 ± 11.3 (women) and 33.5 ± 10.5 (men) years old. Emotional eating (EE) and Binge eating (BE) were positively correlated (r = 0.66; p <0.001) and dietary practices were negatively correlated with BE (r = -0.41; p <0.001), EE (r = -0.33; p <0.001) and BMI (r = -0.24; p <0.001). Linear regression demonstrated that EE (
ß
= - 0.1351,
t
= -2.841; p = 0.005; η
p
2
= 0.013), BE (
ß
= - 0.2580,
t
= - 5.612; p < 0.001; η
p
2
= 0.050), not doing physical exercise at home (
ß
= -0.4271,
t
= - 5.933 p < 0.001; η
p
2
= 0.055), be vespertine (
ß
= -0.3435,
t
= 2.076 p = 0.038; η
p
2
= 0.019) and age (
ß
= -0.082,
t
= -2.210; p = 0.027; η
p
2
= 0.008) are negative predictors of dietary practices. Finally, cognitive restraint (
ß
= 0.1407,
t
= 3.858; p < 0.001; η
p
2
= 0.024), better sleep quality (
ß
= 0.1768,
t
= 2.506; p = 0.012; η
p
2
= 0.010), receive 4-10 salaries (
ß
= 0.2568,
t
= 2.573 p = 0.10; η
p
2
= 0.027) and 10 – 20 salaries (
ß
= 0.4490,
t
= 3.726 p < 0.001; η
p
2
= 0.027) are positive pr...