2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.12.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bio-inspired graphene foam decorated with Pt nanoparticles for hydrogen storage at room temperature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Fig. 4B and C, C1s XPS spectra of COOH functionalized graphene and COOH + /graphene show five peaks ascribed to C=C, C-C, C=O, C-O, O=C-O2628293031, which means that COOH functional groups are successfully introduced into graphene via ion implantation and chemical method. These results are consistent with FTIR.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In Fig. 4B and C, C1s XPS spectra of COOH functionalized graphene and COOH + /graphene show five peaks ascribed to C=C, C-C, C=O, C-O, O=C-O2628293031, which means that COOH functional groups are successfully introduced into graphene via ion implantation and chemical method. These results are consistent with FTIR.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Using molecular simulation and experimental results at low pressures of 1.01-2.63 bar (1-2.6 atm) and room temperature for a projection of behavior at high pressures, suggests that the projected hydrogen storage capacity at room temperature and 100 bar is around 3.5 wt.% and 25 gL −1 . Its projected performance at room temperature is significantly better than that of MOF-5 and NU-100 (1.65 wt.% at 48 bar and 1.19 wt.% at 90 bar, respectively) [44,45] and comparable to graphene foam decorated with Pt nanoparticles (3.19 wt.% at 100 bar) [52]. This can be attributed to significantly higher values of isosteric heats (8−12 kJ mol −1 compared to 5-6 kJ mol −1 in MOF-5 and NU-100), due to the flexibility of the system, which provides stronger lattice-hydrogen interactions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Its room temperature performance is 0.3 wt.% at 2.6 bar with isosteric heat of adsorption of 12-13 kJ mol −1 , and predicted to be about 1.8 wt.% at 48 bar and 3.5 wt.% at 100 bar with isosteric heat of around 8.5 kJ mol −1 . While its low pressure performance is inferior to some other room temperature hydrogen storage materials (0.3-0.7 wt.% at 1 atm and 298K) [10][11][12], its high pressure predicted performance is superior or comparable to even the best of the available systems, like graphene foam decorated with Pt nanoparticles (3.19 wt.% at 100 bar) [52]. Its predicted high pressure performance at room temperature is also superior to well known MOFs like MOF-5 and NU-100 (…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…[32][33][34] Nevertheless, reports on extremely high hydrogen uptakes (either in absolute values or relative to reported SSA) by various types of r-GO continue to appear, [35] outnumbering studies which find trivial uptake numbers. [36] In several cases the data presented as an evidence for exceptional hydrogen storage of graphene are represented by abnormal shapes of isotherms [35,37] or obtained by rather uncommon measurement methods. For example, ~4.6wt% uptakes already at 40bar and ambient temperatures were measured by Kim et al using quartz microbalance method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pt, Pd, TiO 2 ) provides increase of hydrogen sorption by 10-500%. [28,31,37] In some studies the hydrogen storage values which satisfy and even exceed DOE targets have been reported for temperatures near ambient and assigned to "spillover" mechanism. For example, Parambhath et al reported uptake of ~3wt% for Pd decorated material with SSA of ~470 m 2 /g already at 40bar H 2 pressure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%