2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.05.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bioactive compounds isolated from Petroselinum crispum L. leaves using bioguided fractionation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many works report the inhibition of seed germination in presence of plant allelochemicals (Reigosa and Pazos-Malvido, 2007;Sbai et al, 2016). C. cardunculus secondary metabolites, such as chlorogenic acid and luteolin 7-O-glucoronide, have been reported to show allelopathic activity on different crops (Li et al, 1993;Abdul-Rahman and Habib, 1989;Hosni et al, 2013).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many works report the inhibition of seed germination in presence of plant allelochemicals (Reigosa and Pazos-Malvido, 2007;Sbai et al, 2016). C. cardunculus secondary metabolites, such as chlorogenic acid and luteolin 7-O-glucoronide, have been reported to show allelopathic activity on different crops (Li et al, 1993;Abdul-Rahman and Habib, 1989;Hosni et al, 2013).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Root sensitivity to phytotoxic substances is the best indicator of the allelopathic effect of plant extracts (Grisi et al, 2012;Ladhari et al, 2013). Several previous studies have also reported that the inhibitory effect of plant extracts is more pronounced on root growth than shoot growth (Liu et al, 2018;Sbai et al, 2016). Such root inhibition might be due to the higher permeability of root tissue, which allows more allelochemicals to enter the roots compared with shoots because the shoot surface is covered with a well-developed cuticular layer, whereas the root surface lacks this layer (Gulzar et al, 2016;Yoshimura et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a study on the botanical origins of the Hakkari propolis samples, Bayram (2015) [38] reported that 71 plant taxa belonging to 34 families were determined to be present at different ratios in the propolis samples and the pollens of the plants belonging to the families of Apiaceae (2.7%-35%), Asteraceae (3.4%-35.4%) and Fabaceae (12%-66%). It has been reported that coumarins angelicin [39,40], bergapten [39,41,42], bergaptol [43,44], columbianetin [43], decursin [45], jatamansin [46], lomatin [47,48] methoxsalen [49], oroselone [50], osthole [51], oxypeucedanin [52,53,54], prangenin [55], psoralen [40,43], seselin [56], suberosin [57,58], xanthotoxol [59,60], 2-isopropenyl-2,3-dihydrofuro[3,2-g]chromen-7-one [61], 3-methyl-but-2-enoic acid, 2,2-dimethyl-8-oxo-3,4-dihydro-2H,8H-pyrano[3,2-g]chromen-3-yl ester [62], and 4-(3-methyl-2-oxobutoxy)-7H-furo[3,2-g][1]benzopyran-7-one (isooxypeucedanin) [63] are found in the chemical composition of different plants belonging to the Apiaceae family. Similarly, psoralen, angelicin [64], bergapten [65], and seselin [66] have been reported to be present in the Fabaceae family plants.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%