Comprehensive Biomaterials 2011
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-08-055294-1.00026-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bioactivity: Mechanisms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 122 publications
(299 reference statements)
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…() demonstrated a beneficial effect of Si 4+ and Ca 2+ ionic dissolution products on osteoblast differentiation. Previously, we were able to show that the greater stimulatory effect on osteogenesis in vitro and in vivo observed with the silica containing CaOP material, which was used for fabricating the scaffolds in the current study, when compared to TCP and bioactive glass 45S5 as well as other CaOPs, was associated with simultaneous activation of the ERK‐differentiation, the PI3K cell survival and the alternate p38 pathways, which in its turn was positively correlated with silica and calcium release from the bioceramic as well as calcium uptake at the biomaterial surface (Knabe and Ducheyne ). Consequently, it may be speculated that the greater Si and Ca‐ion release noted with the RP scaffolds, when compared to the SSM scaffolds, may have had a beneficial effect on osteoblast differentiation and bone matrix formation in the present study, since a higher amount of cells and ECM formation was observed in RP scaffolds, when compared to SSM scaffolds, with these osteoblasts and newly formed bone matrix displaying greater OC expression, i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…() demonstrated a beneficial effect of Si 4+ and Ca 2+ ionic dissolution products on osteoblast differentiation. Previously, we were able to show that the greater stimulatory effect on osteogenesis in vitro and in vivo observed with the silica containing CaOP material, which was used for fabricating the scaffolds in the current study, when compared to TCP and bioactive glass 45S5 as well as other CaOPs, was associated with simultaneous activation of the ERK‐differentiation, the PI3K cell survival and the alternate p38 pathways, which in its turn was positively correlated with silica and calcium release from the bioceramic as well as calcium uptake at the biomaterial surface (Knabe and Ducheyne ). Consequently, it may be speculated that the greater Si and Ca‐ion release noted with the RP scaffolds, when compared to the SSM scaffolds, may have had a beneficial effect on osteoblast differentiation and bone matrix formation in the present study, since a higher amount of cells and ECM formation was observed in RP scaffolds, when compared to SSM scaffolds, with these osteoblasts and newly formed bone matrix displaying greater OC expression, i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…an advanced maturation stage. Furthermore, previously we were able to demonstrate formation of a carbonated apatite surface and fibronectin serum protein adsorption after immersion of CaOP ceramics in physiologic solutions (Knabe and Ducheyne, ). The Ca–P‐rich zone under the adsorbed protein layer thickened as a result of continuous Ca and P diffusion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 3 more Smart Citations