1966
DOI: 10.21236/ad0481042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biochemical and Physical Changes in Shaken Suspensions of Pasteurella Pestis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1969
1969
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Floc formation from other types of polymer should also be considered. Wessman and Miller (23) found that clumping of Pasteurella pestis was caused by the polymerization of extracellular nucleic acids that were excreted by the cells. The role of PHB reported by Crabtree et al (6) should also be further considered as an explanation of bacterial flocculation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Floc formation from other types of polymer should also be considered. Wessman and Miller (23) found that clumping of Pasteurella pestis was caused by the polymerization of extracellular nucleic acids that were excreted by the cells. The role of PHB reported by Crabtree et al (6) should also be further considered as an explanation of bacterial flocculation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 2004 cans and Vibrio costicolus growing in nutritionally defi cient media, DNA plays a role of connector: it is secreted into the medium to maintain cell aggregates [55]. A sim ilar phenomenon was described in Pasteurella (Yersinia) pestis [56]. The cells of Staphylococcus aureus secrete excessive amounts of RNA and proteins participating in cell aggregation [57].…”
Section: Cell-cell Interactions Mediated By Physical Factors (Intercementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Floc formation would be caused by these polymers, and treatment with a suitable exopolymer-degrading enzyme would cause deflocculation of the floc. In pure culture, there are many bacteria that form flocs susceptible to cellulase and some that form flocs susceptible to protease or deoxyribonuclease (1, 3,6,9,13,17). The natural floc of activated sludge, however, could not be entirely deflocculated by these enzymes (11).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%