1963
DOI: 10.2307/2411532
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biochemical Relationships of the Mouse Peromyscus in New England

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

1968
1968
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is conceivable that Ixodes ticks may have had a much wider distribution range when its main reproductive host, the deer, was more widespread (36). For some rodent hosts, phylogeographic patterns similar to that seen here for B. burgdorferi have been shown, i.e., Northeastern, Midwestern, and Western populations, with the Midwest and Californian clades being linked geographically (and via interbreeding at hybridization zones) by Rocky Mountain-Great Plains clades (15,51). Such a pattern is consistent with the phylogeographies of Hanta virus and its deer mouse reservoirs (15).…”
Section: Tablesupporting
confidence: 85%
“…It is conceivable that Ixodes ticks may have had a much wider distribution range when its main reproductive host, the deer, was more widespread (36). For some rodent hosts, phylogeographic patterns similar to that seen here for B. burgdorferi have been shown, i.e., Northeastern, Midwestern, and Western populations, with the Midwest and Californian clades being linked geographically (and via interbreeding at hybridization zones) by Rocky Mountain-Great Plains clades (15,51). Such a pattern is consistent with the phylogeographies of Hanta virus and its deer mouse reservoirs (15).…”
Section: Tablesupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The range of the lizards that serve as the main host for the more southern ticks generally extends northward along the Atlantic coast only to that latitude. The host associations of deer ticks suggest that their ranges may correspond to the post-Wisconsin relict distributions of their vertebrate hosts (32).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If our assumption that extent of lipid deposition reflects degree of adaptation to winter climates is correct, then P. maniculatus is better adapted than R. megalotis to the plains environment at the latitude of Kansas. There is good reason to believe that P. maniculatus evolved in sub boreal habitats of North America, and subsequently became established farther to the south or west on the Great Plains (see, for example, Waters, 1963), whereas the western harvest mouse almost certainly dispersed northward to the Great Plains from a center of dispersal in southern Mexico (Hooper, 1952). Therefore, R. megalotis probably has not been exposed to the selective pressures of a temperate continental climate for as long as P. maniculatus, and must resort to increased secondary production in the form of lipid deposition as a means of adaptation to adverse winter conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%