2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2008.10.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bioclogging in porous media: Model development and sensitivity to initial conditions

Abstract: 15This work presents a numerical model able to simulate the effect of biomass growth on the hydrau-16 lic properties of saturated porous media, i.e., bioclogging. A new module for an existing coupled 17 flow and reactive-transport code-PHWAT-was implemented. Laboratory experiments were used to 18 validate the model.. Good agreement with the experimental data was found. Model behavior was 19 satisfactory in terms of numerical discretization errors and parameter calibration, although-grid-20 independent results … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
77
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
77
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Increases in biofilm thickness are countered by the detachment of cells due to mechanical forces exerted at the surface of the biofilm by fluid motion (40) formulation based on the empirical study of ref. 50 is one of the most widely used (45,(51)(52)(53)(54)(55) and has been independently confirmed for biofilms growing in porous media (54,55). Here, the detachment rate is approximated by dk /dt = −χk τ 1/2 , where χ is an empirical parameter with units of length/mass that measures the ability of the biofilm to resist detachment, and τ is the shear stress exerted by the flow on the surface of the biofilm.…”
Section: Significancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increases in biofilm thickness are countered by the detachment of cells due to mechanical forces exerted at the surface of the biofilm by fluid motion (40) formulation based on the empirical study of ref. 50 is one of the most widely used (45,(51)(52)(53)(54)(55) and has been independently confirmed for biofilms growing in porous media (54,55). Here, the detachment rate is approximated by dk /dt = −χk τ 1/2 , where χ is an empirical parameter with units of length/mass that measures the ability of the biofilm to resist detachment, and τ is the shear stress exerted by the flow on the surface of the biofilm.…”
Section: Significancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biofilm growth is then modeled through a closure law, whose structure is postulated a priori and often based on Monod kinetics. For instance, Kildsgaard and Engegaard 27 and Brovelli et al 15 made remarkable investigations to study the development and spreading of biofilms in 2D porous media from the early stage. These works were based upon an idea developed by Zysset et al: 28 the biofilm growth rate was modeled by a Monod law (with constant parameters not dependent on flow conditions) modulated by a limitation function in order to take into account mass transfer and biofilm activity limitation as the biofilm becomes thicker.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular mass transfer, which affects directly nutrient availability towards bacterial cells, and then their growth rate, 12 is strongly dependent on flow conditions. 13,14 Yet, the couplings between these local mechanisms are kinetically controlled (time-dependent) 15 and sensitive to initial conditions of surface colonization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Observed changes in HC could be related to expansion/ shrinkage of expansive minerals, mineral clogging, and bioactivity [30]. Leachate reduced the HC of SMP 1 and [23] is attributable to the bioactivity of the leachate, causing pore clogging while in addition, a slight consolidation of the soil sample and small reduction of the void ratio also leads to decreased HC [14]. Nutrients load, present in leachates, is responsible for increased formation and development of bacteria and yeast colonies resulting in partial or permanent soil pore blocking [30,61] which might have resulted in low permeability of the soils by a larger diffused double layer (DDL) effect in the soil structure.…”
Section: Hydraulic Conductivity Of Soilsmentioning
confidence: 99%