2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.09.045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bioconjugated nanoparticles for attachment and penetration into pathogenic bacteria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
99
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
4
99
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The somewhat higher values of RSC% in DPPH than in lipid peroxidation indicated that the nanoparticles were more likely to ET-based reaction rather than HAT-based reaction. This behavior was different from that of some organic antioxidants such as rutin, which could react quickly with lipid peroxyl radicals but not nitrogen radicals [42]. The discussion about the difference between Se and organic antioxidants was not discussed because it was beyond the scope of this work.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The somewhat higher values of RSC% in DPPH than in lipid peroxidation indicated that the nanoparticles were more likely to ET-based reaction rather than HAT-based reaction. This behavior was different from that of some organic antioxidants such as rutin, which could react quickly with lipid peroxyl radicals but not nitrogen radicals [42]. The discussion about the difference between Se and organic antioxidants was not discussed because it was beyond the scope of this work.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…After 6 h of exposure, biopsy samples from the small intestines and dorsal skin were immediately obtained for SEM observation. The ultrathin sections were made as following [42]. The small intestines and dorsal skin were quickly sliced into small pieces (1 mm × 1 mm), and then washed and fixed with 2.5% glutaraldehyde in PBS buffer (pH 7.4, 10 mmol/L).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The species-specific antibacterial mechanism may be caused by structural differences in the organization of the bacterial cell wall. Some studies found that the thicker cell wall of G+ bacteria acts as a barrier protecting the cell from penetration of silver nanoparticles and ions into the cytoplasm 19, 20 . This may be part of the reason CSS-Ag NPs exhibited a better antibacterial effect on G− bacteria rather than G+ bacteria.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cell suspension was sampled at 0, 5, 30 and 60 min of incubation, stained with fluorescent dye using the LIVE/DEAD kit for 15 min in the dark, and smeared on glass slides. Fluorescence images were taken under a fluorescence microscope using excitation and emission wavelengths of 494 and 515 nm for Sytox® Green and 528 and 617 nm for propidium iodide, respectively [28]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%