2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2016.10.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biodegradability of DBP precursors after drinking water ozonation

Abstract: 25Ozonation is known to generate biodegradable organic matter, which is typically reduced by 26 biological filtration to avoid bacterial regrowth in distribution systems. Post-chlorination generates 27 halogenated disinfection byproducts (DBPs) but little is known about the biodegradability of their 28precursors. This study determined the effect of ozonation and biofiltration conditions, specifically 29 ozone exposure and empty bed contact time (EBCT), on the control of DBP formation potentials in 30 drinking … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, biofiltration performance using biologically active carbon (BAC) has shown to be impacted by water temperature (Emelko et al, 2006;Moll et al, 1999), empty bed contact time (EBCT), and accumulation of attached microbial biomass (Elhadi et al, 2006). Because of these factors, BAC performance in terms of geosmin, MIB, as well as DBP precursor removals can vary significantly (de Vera et al, 2016;Elhadi et al, 2004;Guo et al, 2016). In addition, O3 efficiency is dependent on source water characteristics such as pH, DOC, alkalinity, and temperature (Westerhoff et al, 2006), which warrants site-specific pilot studies for optimization of O3 and biofiltration treatment.…”
Section: List Of Figuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, biofiltration performance using biologically active carbon (BAC) has shown to be impacted by water temperature (Emelko et al, 2006;Moll et al, 1999), empty bed contact time (EBCT), and accumulation of attached microbial biomass (Elhadi et al, 2006). Because of these factors, BAC performance in terms of geosmin, MIB, as well as DBP precursor removals can vary significantly (de Vera et al, 2016;Elhadi et al, 2004;Guo et al, 2016). In addition, O3 efficiency is dependent on source water characteristics such as pH, DOC, alkalinity, and temperature (Westerhoff et al, 2006), which warrants site-specific pilot studies for optimization of O3 and biofiltration treatment.…”
Section: List Of Figuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, BAC performance is impacted by water temperature (Emelko et al, 2006;Moll et al, 1999), empty bed contact time (EBCT), and accumulation of attached microbial biomass (Elhadi et al, 2006). Because of these factors, BAC performance in terms of geosmin, MIB, as well as DBP precursor removals can vary significantly (de Vera et al, 2016;Elhadi et al, 2004;Guo et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biofiltration provides water quality benefits such as improved distribution system biostability and biodegradation of organic carbon, disinfection byproduct precursors, and other contaminants, [1][2][3][4] while meeting regulatory filter effluent turbidity guidelines. 5 Monitoring biofilter efficiency may include water quality parameters such as biological activity (i.e., adenosine triphosphate (ATP)), dissolved oxygen consumption, or various organic carbon measurements (e.g., biodegradable/assimilable organic carbon, fluorescence excitation-emission matrices, size-exclusion chromatography, etc.).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 ) compared to Cl 2 /GAC and raw/GAC. The order of breakthrough for each individual class of DBP contrasted with reported removals from pre-ozonated biofiltration that used GAC media in wastewater ( Chuang and Mitch, 2017 ) and drinking water ( De Vera et al., 2016 ; Fu et al., 2017 ). For example, GAC with pre-ozonation followed breakthrough performance ( Table 1 ) in the order HNMs ∼ HALs > HAA5 > HANs > HKs > HAMs > THMs, while Chuang and Mitch (2017) reported biofiltration removals in the order HNMs > HAMs > HALs > HKs > THMs > HAAs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%