2014
DOI: 10.1002/jobm.201400464
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biodegradation of p‐cresol and sulfide removal by a marine‐denitrifying consortium

Abstract: The simultaneous removal of sulfide and p-cresol was carried out by using a marine-denitrifying consortium collected in the coastal zone of Sonora, Mexico. Different experimental conditions were used to evaluate the capacity of the consortium to simultaneously eliminate nitrate, sulfide, and p-cresol. For instance, the first set of assays was conducted at different sulfide concentrations (20, 50, and 100 mg S(2À) L(À1) ), with a fixed concentration of p-cresol (45 mg C L(À1) ). The second set of assays was dev… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 23 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The detected SRB genera were also of lower abundance ( Desulfobulus -like species (<0.01%) and Desulfomicrobium -like species (<0.01%)) than the previous study ( Desulfobulus -like species (10.6%) and Desulfomicrobium -like species (10.5%)) 6 . Instead, the denitrifying bacteria genera, such as Thiobacillus genera (4.7%) 26 27 , Thioclava genera (1.1%) 28 , Paracoccus genera (3.2%) and Thauera genera (24.3%) 29 , and Unclassified genera (26.1%) were identified to be the predominant groups in the sludge sample which was not considered and investigated in previous studies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The detected SRB genera were also of lower abundance ( Desulfobulus -like species (<0.01%) and Desulfomicrobium -like species (<0.01%)) than the previous study ( Desulfobulus -like species (10.6%) and Desulfomicrobium -like species (10.5%)) 6 . Instead, the denitrifying bacteria genera, such as Thiobacillus genera (4.7%) 26 27 , Thioclava genera (1.1%) 28 , Paracoccus genera (3.2%) and Thauera genera (24.3%) 29 , and Unclassified genera (26.1%) were identified to be the predominant groups in the sludge sample which was not considered and investigated in previous studies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%