Bioelectroanalytical Determination of Rutin Based on bi‐Enzymatic Sensor Containing Iridium Nanoparticles in Ionic Liquid Phase Supported in Clay

Zapp, Eduardo; Brondani, Daniela; Vieira, Iolanda Cruz; Dupont, Jaı̈rton; Scheeren, Carla Weber

doi:10.1002/elan.201000619

Cited by 8 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 53 publications

(86 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Enzymes, antibodies, and nucleic acid are generally used as recognition components. Glucose oxidase and glucose dehydrogenase for glucose [ 67 , 68 ], horseradish peroxidase for H 2 O 2 [ 69 ], urease for urea [ 70 ], laccase and polyphenol oxidase for rutin [ 71 ], tryptophan oxidase for tryptophan [ 72 ], etc. act as sensitive recognition elements.…”

Section: General Biosensing Mechanismmentioning

confidence: 99%

NiCo2O4 Nano-/Microstructures as High-Performance Biosensors: A Review

Kumar¹

2020

Nano-Micro Lett.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Non-enzymatic biosensors based on mixed transition metal oxides are deemed as the most promising devices due to their high sensitivity, selectivity, wide concentration range, low detection limits, and excellent recyclability. Spinel NiCo2O4 mixed oxides have drawn considerable attention recently due to their outstanding advantages including large specific surface area, high permeability, short electron, and ion diffusion pathways. Because of the rapid development of non-enzyme biosensors, the current state of methods for synthesis of pure and composite/hybrid NiCo2O4 materials and their subsequent electrochemical biosensing applications are systematically and comprehensively reviewed herein. Comparative analysis reveals better electrochemical sensing of bioanalytes by one-dimensional and two-dimensional NiCo2O4 nano-/microstructures than other morphologies. Better biosensing efficiency of NiCo2O4 as compared to corresponding individual metal oxides, viz. NiO and Co3O4, is attributed to the close intrinsic-state redox couples of Ni3+/Ni2+ (0.58 V/0.49 V) and Co3+/Co2+ (0.53 V/0.51 V). Biosensing performance of NiCo2O4 is also significantly improved by making the composites of NiCo2O4 with conducting carbonaceous materials like graphene, reduced graphene oxide, carbon nanotubes (single and multi-walled), carbon nanofibers; conducting polymers like polypyrrole (PPy), polyaniline (PANI); metal oxides NiO, Co3O4, SnO2, MnO2; and metals like Au, Pd, etc. Various factors affecting the morphologies and biosensing parameters of the nano-/micro-structured NiCo2O4 are also highlighted. Finally, some drawbacks and future perspectives related to this promising field are outlined.

show abstract

Section: General Biosensing Mechanismmentioning

confidence: 99%

NiCo2O4 Nano-/Microstructures as High-Performance Biosensors: A Review

Kumar¹

2020

Nano-Micro Lett.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Among them, the electrochemical method has attracted extensive attention because of its portability of equipment, simple experiment process, low cost, high sensitivity, accuracy, and fast response [ 15 , 16 ]. A variety of materials have been used to construct electrochemical sensors for rutin determination, such as Ir NPs-IL-clay/PPO-Lac [ 17 ], AuNPs-CD-Lac [ 18 ], MWCNTs-IL-Gel [ 19 ], MIPIL/IL-GR [ 20 ], Fe 2.5 Cr 0.2 Ce 0.3 O 4 -rGO [ 21 ], etc.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

MWCNTs-CTAB and HFs-Lac Nanocomposite-Modified Glassy Carbon Electrode for Rutin Determination

Song

Xiang²,

Xiao³

et al. 2022

Biosensors

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Rutin is a flavonoid glycoside compound, which is mainly transported via the blood circulation system in the human body. The monitoring of the blood concentration of rutin is of great significance in many fields such as pharmacology and pharmacokinetics. In this work, a biosensor based on multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs), cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB), hydroxyl fullerenes (HFs), and laccase (Lac) nanocomposite-modified glassy carbon electrodes was constructed. The modified materials were characterized with a transmission electron microscope (TEM), cyclic voltammograms (CV), and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS). CTAB is used to disperse MWCNTs and improve hydrophilicity and biocompatibility of MWCNTs, while the use of Lac can enhance the oxidation of catechol structure in rutin, thus significantly improving the sensitivity and selectivity of the modified electrode. Linear sweep voltammetry (LSV) studies showed that the determination linear ranges of rutin were 0.1 µmol L−1 to 2 µmol L−1 and 2 µmol L−1 to 11 µmol L−1, with the determination limits of 30 nmol L−1 and 95.5 nmol L−1, respectively. The proposed biosensor can be used to detect rutin tablets and serum samples with high recovery, which indicates a good accuracy of this method, and the results are consistent with those measured by the traditional ultra-high performance liquid chromatography (UHPLC) method. Hence, this biosensor has potential practical application value in rutin drug quality testing and clinical blood drug concentration monitoring.

show abstract

“…However, CS has as main disadvantage to act as an insulator, which hinders the charge-transfer process. In order to improve the current signal, the enrichment of CS matrix with metallic nanoparticles has shown interesting results [21,24,29,33]. Graphene shows great promise for the development of electrochemical biosensors due to its excellent mechanical flexibility, fast electron transfer, and good biocompatibility [13,[34][35][36].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Enzyme selection and their sources have a major influence on the biosensor sensitivity [19,22]. The few studies dedicated to bi-enzymatic biosensors [17][18][19][20][21][23][24][25] reported in the last ten years are summarized in Table 1S (Supplementary material). As far as the authors know, there is no publication related to the application of bi-enzymatic biosensors for the quantification of pesticides in food commodities or in other real samples.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Still, many of these devices need to improve their performance because of the low maximum residue limits (MRLs) established worldwide for pesticides [15,16]. Considerable positive synergistic effects on the current signal can be attained by combining several enzymes [17][18][19][20][21]. Enzyme selection and their sources have a major influence on the biosensor sensitivity [19,22].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Sensitive bi-enzymatic biosensor based on polyphenoloxidases–gold nanoparticles–chitosan hybrid film–graphene doped carbon paste electrode for carbamates detection

Oliveira

Barroso

Araújo

et al. 2014

Bioelectrochemistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A bi-enzymatic biosensor (LACC-TYR-AuNPs-CS/GPE) for carbamates was prepared in a single step by electro-deposition of a hybrid film onto a graphene doped carbon paste electrode (GPE). Graphene and the gold nanopar-ticles (AuNPs) were morphologically characterized by transmission electron microscopy, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, dynamic light scattering and laser Doppler velocimetry. The electrodeposited hybrid film was composed of laccase (LACC), tyrosinase (TYR) and AuNPs entrapped in a chitosan (CS) polymeric matrix. Exper-imental parameters, namely graphene redox state, AuNPs:CS ratio, enzymes concentration, pH and inhibition time were evaluated. LACC-TYR-AuNPs-CS/GPE exhibited an improved Michaelis-Menten kinetic constant (26.9 ± 0.5 M) when compared with LACC-AuNPs-CS/GPE (37.8 ± 0.2 M) and TYR-AuNPs-CS/GPE (52.3 ± 0.4 M). Using 4-aminophenol as substrate at pH 5.5, the device presented wide linear ranges, low detection limits (1.68 × 10 −9 ± 1.18× 10 −10 -2.15 × 10 −7 ± 3.41 × 10 −9 M), high accuracy, sensitivity (1.13 × 10 6 ± 8.11 × 10 4 -2.19 × 10 8 ± 2.51× 10 7 %inhibition M −1 ), repeatability (1.2-5.8% RSD), reproducibility (3.2-6.5% RSD) and stability (ca. twenty days) to determine carbaryl, formetanate hydrochloride, propoxur and ziram in citrus fruits based on their inhibitory capacity on the polyphenoloxidases activity. Recoveries at two fortified levels ranged from 93.8 ± 0.3% (lemon) to 97.8 ± 0.3% (orange). Glucose, citric acid and ascorbic acid do not interfere signifi-cantly in the electroanalysis. The proposed electroanalytical procedure can be a promising tool for food safety control.

show abstract

Bioelectroanalytical Determination of Rutin Based on bi‐Enzymatic Sensor Containing Iridium Nanoparticles in Ionic Liquid Phase Supported in Clay

Cited by 8 publications

References 53 publications

NiCo2O4 Nano-/Microstructures as High-Performance Biosensors: A Review

NiCo2O4 Nano-/Microstructures as High-Performance Biosensors: A Review

MWCNTs-CTAB and HFs-Lac Nanocomposite-Modified Glassy Carbon Electrode for Rutin Determination

Sensitive bi-enzymatic biosensor based on polyphenoloxidases–gold nanoparticles–chitosan hybrid film–graphene doped carbon paste electrode for carbamates detection

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About