2003
DOI: 10.1002/bdd.361
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bioequivalence evaluation of two brands of furosemide 40mg tablets (Salurin and Lasix) in healthy human volunteers

Abstract: A randomized, two-way, crossover, bioequivalence study was conducted in 24 fasting, healthy, male volunteers to compare two brands of furosemide 40 mg tablets, Salurin (Julphar, UAE) as test and Lasix (Hoechst AG, Germany) as reference product. The study was performed at the International Pharmaceutical Research Centre (IPRC), in a joint venture with Al-Mowasah Hospital, Amman, Jordan. One tablet of either formulation was administered with 240 ml of water after a 10 h overnight fast. After dosing, serial blood… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many studies reported in the literature asserted that the drug products studied were bioequivalent, but most studies used small subject numbers and statistical methods that do not meet current requirements. Only the Nakib et al81 and Cuadrado et al82 studies appeared to have reached a BE conclusion based on currently accepted methodology. On the other hand, in the Thai,79 Wolf‐Coporda et al,84 McNamara et al,57 and Rubinstein and Rughani85 studies, at least one of the products showed such large differences in pharmacokinetic parameters from those of the comparator that it is most likely that that product would be declared bio in equivalent after application of statistical testing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many studies reported in the literature asserted that the drug products studied were bioequivalent, but most studies used small subject numbers and statistical methods that do not meet current requirements. Only the Nakib et al81 and Cuadrado et al82 studies appeared to have reached a BE conclusion based on currently accepted methodology. On the other hand, in the Thai,79 Wolf‐Coporda et al,84 McNamara et al,57 and Rubinstein and Rughani85 studies, at least one of the products showed such large differences in pharmacokinetic parameters from those of the comparator that it is most likely that that product would be declared bio in equivalent after application of statistical testing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nakib et al81 reported BE of a brand of furosemide 40 mg tablets versus Lasix®. The compositions of the products were not reported.…”
Section: Dosage Form Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic aspects related to administration of furosemide and spironolactone as individual medications are also available in literature [13][14][15][16][17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After oral dosing of 40 mg FRS, the peak plasma concentration is 1.163 µg/mL 27 , as a result the method could be used in the estimation of the drug in plasma. After preparing the samples, they were analyzed as described before under section (2.5.3).…”
Section: Analysis Of Spiked Human Plasmamentioning
confidence: 99%