“…Many studies reported in the literature asserted that the drug products studied were bioequivalent, but most studies used small subject numbers and statistical methods that do not meet current requirements. Only the Nakib et al81 and Cuadrado et al82 studies appeared to have reached a BE conclusion based on currently accepted methodology. On the other hand, in the Thai,79 Wolf‐Coporda et al,84 McNamara et al,57 and Rubinstein and Rughani85 studies, at least one of the products showed such large differences in pharmacokinetic parameters from those of the comparator that it is most likely that that product would be declared bio in equivalent after application of statistical testing.…”