2006
DOI: 10.1128/jb.00673-06
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biofilm Formation byStreptococcus pneumoniae: Role of Choline, Extracellular DNA, and Capsular Polysaccharide in Microbial Accretion

Abstract: Streptococcus pneumoniae colonizes the human upper respiratory tract, and this asymptomatic colonization is known to precede pneumococcal disease. In this report, chemically defined and semisynthetic media were used to identify the initial steps of biofilm formation by pneumococcus during growth on abiotic surfaces such as polystyrene or glass. Unencapsulated pneumococci adhered to abiotic surfaces and formed a three-dimensional structure about 25 m deep, as observed by confocal laser scanning microscopy and l… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

21
394
2
6

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 299 publications
(423 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
21
394
2
6
Order By: Relevance
“…DNase treatment has been shown to disrupt P. aeruginosa biofilm grown in vitro (35,46) and is used in combination with antibiotics to treat P. aeruginosa infections of cystic fibrosis patients (47). Treatment of streptococcal biofilm with DNase has also been shown to have a negative effect on biofilm adherence (41,48,49). These results correlate with our findings that DNase treatment had a greater ability to interfere with biofilm adherence in the wild-type S. aureus strain relative to the cidA mutant, presumably because the mutant biofilm contains less eDNA (Figs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DNase treatment has been shown to disrupt P. aeruginosa biofilm grown in vitro (35,46) and is used in combination with antibiotics to treat P. aeruginosa infections of cystic fibrosis patients (47). Treatment of streptococcal biofilm with DNase has also been shown to have a negative effect on biofilm adherence (41,48,49). These results correlate with our findings that DNase treatment had a greater ability to interfere with biofilm adherence in the wild-type S. aureus strain relative to the cidA mutant, presumably because the mutant biofilm contains less eDNA (Figs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The impact of biofilms, both bacterial and fungal, are increasingly recognized as threats to public health due to the fact that biofilm formation is involved in more than 60% of bacterial infections, as well as being recognized as a causative agent in most medical device-related infections [75,76]. In their biofilm forms, bacteria and fungi are resistant to most antimicrobials, due to decreased metabolism and the barrier provided by the extracellular matrix [77][78][79].…”
Section: Antibiofilm Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, the significance of eDNA for cellular attachment and structural integrity has more recently been recognized for an increasing number of Gram-negative and Grampositive species (Whitchurch et al, 2002;Steinberger and Holden, 2005;Allesen-Holm et al, 2006;Moscoso et al, 2006;Jurcisek and Bakaletz, 2007;Qin et al, 2007;Izano et al, 2008;Thomas et al, 2008;Heijstra et al, 2009;Vilain et al, 2009;Harmsen et al, 2010;Lappann et al, 2010). Release of DNA in bacterial biofilms has mainly been attributed to the lysis of a cellular subpopulation, mediated by the activity of autolysis systems (Allesen-Holm et al, 2006;Rice et al, 2007;Thomas et al, 2008Thomas et al, , 2009Mann et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%