Biofilm formation on the surface of modern implant abutment materials

Hahnel, Sebastian; Wieser, Angela; Lang, Reinhold W.; Rosentritt, Martin

doi:10.1111/clr.12454

Cited by 170 publications

(165 citation statements)

References 20 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

141

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Material wear leads to surface roughness promoting biofilm formation. Hahnel et al investigated this process on PEEK, zirconia and titanium surfaces and found equal or less biofilm formation on PEEK surface [34]. The wear behavior of a resin-based CAD/CAM-nanocomposite and even a direct nanocomposite material was not significantly different from that of human enamel [36].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Two-body wear rate of PEEK, CAD/CAM resin composite and PMMA: Effect of specimen geometries, antagonist materials and test set-up configuration

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Two-body wear rate of PEEK, CAD/CAM resin composite and PMMA: Effect of specimen geometries, antagonist materials and test set-up configuration

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Five were clinical reports [2,6,8,18,24] and 35 were papers on PEEK surface treatments [13][14][15][16][17] how the bioactivity of PEEK can be improved [1,21]; the characteristics of CFR-PEEK [3,7,[19][20]; the biocompatibility of PEEK [5]; PEEK applications [4,8,[10][11]30]; PEEK biofilm formation [22,[31][32][33][34], PEEK as an abutment material and as an implant material [12,23,[25][26][27][28][29]35,40] and the use of CAD-CAM with PEEK [36][37][38][39]. …”

Section: Literature Search and Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…It has been reported that PEEK, compared with titanium, presented the lowest BIC [31][32]. To achieve good bioactivity, many modifications for pure PEEK have been proposed [1,[3][4]9,14,[17][18][19][20][21][22].…”

Section: Bic-types Of Peekmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) as a medical and dental material. A literature review

Ortega-Martínez

Farré-Lladós

Cano-Batalla

et al. 2017

MRAJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: Thermoplastic polymers have many potential uses in medicine and dentistry as an alternative to the commonly used titanium. Due to several advantages of these materials, metal-free restorations are performing an important role in current medical therapies. The aim of this review was to evaluate Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) as an alternative material to titanium in medical and dental clinical cases. Methods:Original scientific articles published in Medline-Pubmed database were electronically searched to accomplish the objectives of the study. Only articles published in English were included from 2000 to present using a variety of keywords in combination. The studies relevant to our review were analysed and compared. Conclusions:The literature suggests that PEEK offers an alternative to titanium, especially in cases of orthopaedics and trauma. Its properties make it an interesting material in oral implantology to be performed with CAD-CAM. Further studies are required to obtain sufficient scientific evidence to enable its uses as a permanent material.

show abstract

“…19,20 Bununla birlikte in-vitro çalışma-larda titanyum dayanakların kırılma dayanımının zirkonya dayanaklardan yüksek olduğu bildirilmiştir. 19,25,28 Uygun bir bağlantı tasarımı, dikkatle kontrol edilmiş bir oklüzyon ve de iyi planlanmış restorasyonlar uzun dönemde zirkonya dayanakların klinik başarısı için gereklidir. Üretim Şekillerine Göre Dayanaklar…”

Section: Zirkonya Dayanaklarunclassified

Abutment Selection for Implant Supported Fixed Prosthodontic Restorations

Şen¹,

Us²

2019

Turkiye Klinikleri J Dental Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Ö ÖZ ZE ET T Diş Hekimliği'nde implant uygulamaları, yüksek başarı ve sağkalım oranları ile diş eksikliği nedeniyle kaybedilen fonksiyon ve estetiği geri kazandırmak için sıklıkla tercih edilen bir tedavi seçeneğidir. Son yıllarda, hasta ve hekimlerin artan estetik beklentileri, oral implantolojinin protetik aşamasını çok daha önemli bir hale getirmiştir. Oral implantolojide, implant destekli sabit protetik restorasyonlar için kullanılan dayanaklar, sıkça güncellenen komponentler arasındadır. Üretici firmalar tarafından pek çok farklı dayanak seçeneği piyasaya sunulmakta ve bu çeşitlilik hekim için tercih yapmayı zorlaştırmaktadır. Dental implant uygulamalarında, kapsamlı bir tedavi planlaması için biyomekanik, estetik, periodontal ve restoratif malzeme seçeneğinin de aralarında bulunduğu pek çok parametre dikkatle değer-lendirilmelidir. Doğru bir dayanak seçimi, mekanik olarak stabil ve estetik olarak beklentiyi karşılayan protetik restorasyonlar üretilebilmesi için kritik önem taşımaktadır. Mevcut klinik duruma uygun bir dayanak seçimi için kullanılacak olan dayanağın materyali, şekli, tipi ve implant-dayanak bağlantı tasarımı hakkında bilgi sahibi olunması gerekir. Dental implantların uzun dönem klinik başarısı, mikrohareket, anti-rotasyonel stabilite ve bakteriyal sızıntı gibi implant-dayanak bağlantısı ile ilgili çeşitli faktörlerden etkilenmektedir. Bu çalışmada; dayanak çeşitleri, şekilleri, dayanak üretiminde kullanılan malzemeler ve piyasada mevcut implant-dayanak bağlantı tasarımları ile ilgili bilgi verilmesi amaçlanmaktadır. İmplant destekli sabit protetik restorasyonlar için dayanak seçimi konusunda bilgi sahibi olmak, hekimin klinik pratikte zorlayıcı bir karar olan dayanak tercihini kolaylaştırmaya yardımcı olabilir.A An na ah h t ta ar r K Ke e l li i m me e l le er r: : Diş implantasyonu, endosseöz; dental implant-kaide tasarımı; diş dayanakları A AB BS S T TR RA AC CT T Dental implant therapy is an often preferred treatment option to restore oral functions and aesthetics in patients with missing teeth. The restorative procedure of implant dentistry has become increasingly sophisticated in recent years due to the constant increase of patient's demands for dental esthetics. Abutments for implant supported restorations are among the components that undergo frequent updates. Several abutment options have been introduced to dental market that makes the selection more complex and complicated for the clinicians. Many factors should be considered for a comprehensive treatment planning including biomechanics, esthetics, bone maintenance and restorative material options. Choosing the correct abutment has great importance to achieve a mechanically stable and esthetically pleasing restoration. It is critical to know the details of available abutment materials, their shapes, the type and design of the implant-abutment connection to select an appropriate abutment in any clinical situation. The long term success of dental implants are affected by various parameters related to the implant-abutment connection s...

show abstract

Biofilm formation on the surface of modern implant abutment materials

Cited by 170 publications

References 20 publications

Two-body wear rate of PEEK, CAD/CAM resin composite and PMMA: Effect of specimen geometries, antagonist materials and test set-up configuration

Two-body wear rate of PEEK, CAD/CAM resin composite and PMMA: Effect of specimen geometries, antagonist materials and test set-up configuration

Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) as a medical and dental material. A literature review

Abutment Selection for Implant Supported Fixed Prosthodontic Restorations

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About