2012
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.11-9114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biofilm-Forming Capacity ofStaphylococcus epidermidis,Staphylococcus aureus, andPseudomonas aeruginosafrom Ocular Infections

Abstract: Ophthalmic isolates of S. epidermidis and S. aureus could produce biofilms in vitro, whereas clinical strains of P. aeruginosa could not. The bacterial strains possess the genetic ability to produce biofilms, but that does not necessarily mean that biofilms will be produced. The knowledge of the process of bacterial adhesion suggests that a timely and appropriate intervention strategy be implemented in the early stages of biofilm-mediated infections.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

7
59
1
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
7
59
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Phenotypically, quantification of biofilm formation under static conditions was determined by microtiter assay as already reported with little modification (11). Briefly, 18 h LB-grown cultures diluted 1:100 in fresh LB containing 0.5 glucose were inoculated (200 L per well) into tissue culture-treated 96-well polystyrene microtiter plates (Costar, Corning, NY, USA).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phenotypically, quantification of biofilm formation under static conditions was determined by microtiter assay as already reported with little modification (11). Briefly, 18 h LB-grown cultures diluted 1:100 in fresh LB containing 0.5 glucose were inoculated (200 L per well) into tissue culture-treated 96-well polystyrene microtiter plates (Costar, Corning, NY, USA).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the study of Semczuk, all the isolates producing biofilm phenotypically harbored icaAD genes. In Hou's study, among 55.56% of isolates that produced biofilm in phenotypic test, 11.11% contained the icaA gene (26), but the other genes has not been investigated. In this study, methicillin resistant isolates harbored higher rate of icaADBC genes compared to MSSA, but no significant difference was confirmed, similar to two other studies (27,28).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies indicated the role of icaA and icaD genes in biofilm production and several reported that all of isolates were icaA positive (29). In the study by Hou et al (30), among 55.56% of isolates that produced biofilm phenotypically, 11.11% had icaA gene, but other genes were not investigated. In this study, methicillin resistant isolates harbored higher rate of icaADBC genes, similar to studies conducted by Khan et al (31) and O'neill et al (32).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%