Biofumigation for Fighting Replant Disease- A Review

Hanschen, Franziska S.; Winkelmann, Traud

doi:10.3390/agronomy10030425

Cited by 34 publications

(28 citation statements)

References 120 publications

(195 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The term biofumigation was initially proposed to describe a disease control technique that incorporated plants or plant residues into the soil to release volatile biocidal compounds during their decomposition (KIRKEGAARD et al, 1993;TSROR et al 2007;LADHALAKSHMI et al, 2015;PRASAD et al, 2015;HANSCHEN & WINKELMANN, 2020). This term was originally proposed by J.…”

Section: Biofumigation -Definition Benefits and Mechanisms Of Actionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The term biofumigation integrates a broader phenomenon by involving a series of allelopathic effects that have been empirically observed in brassica for centuries (PRASAD et al, 2015). Currently, a more detailed approach to biofumigation research has demonstrated its positive effects on disease control, thereby improving our understanding of the processes and mechanisms involved, and its practical application (DIXON & TILSTON, 2010;LAzzERI et al, 2013;CURTO et al, 2016;WEI et al, 2016;MORALES-RODRÍGUEz et al, 2018;DUTTA et al, 2019;JIN et al, 2019;CAMPANELLA et al, 2020;HANSCHEN & WINKELMANN, 2020;MORRIS et al, 2020). This concept has been expanded and popularized to cover the use of a series of organic vegetable materials and animal production residues (GIMSING & KIRKEGAARD, 2009;KIRKEGAARD, 2009, PRASAD et al, 2015KUMAR et al, 2018;DUTTA et al, 2019).…”

Section: Biofumigation -Definition Benefits and Mechanisms Of Actionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Plants containing GSLs also produce a hydrolytic enzyme (thioglucosidase hydrolase), commonly known as myrosinase. In intact tissues, there is a physical separation between GSLs and hydrolytic enzymes (ROSA et al, 1997;GIMSING & KIRKEGAARD, 2009;LADHALAKSHMI et al, 2015;NTALLI & CARBONI, 2017;HANSCHEN & WINKELMANN, 2020). However, with tissue maceration or degradation due to insect attack, mechanical damage, or phytopathogen infection, contact between the enzyme and GSLs is increased.…”

Section: Glucosinolates and Isothiocyanatesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…They also provide good soil coverage and are highly efficient at absorbing nutrients (UgRenOvIć et al, 2019). Among the Brassicaceae family, species of the genera Brassica, Raphanus, Sinapis, and Eruca are the most commonly used for biofumigation (MATTHIESSEN & KIRKEGAARD, 2006;CLARKSON et al, 2015;HANSCHEN & WINKELMANN, 2020;MORRIS et al, 2020).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Substantial technological advances have already been achieved in terms of tests and validation, and commercial products based on the cake obtained from pressing brassica seeds are available for oil extraction, liquid formulations, pellets, leaf extracts, and brassica-based oils (LORD et al, 2011;NICOLA et al, 2013;CURTO et al, 2016;WEI et al, 2016;SERRANO-PéREz et al, 2017;RONCATO et al, 2018;RUBAYET et al, 2018;PONTES et al, 2019). To date, species of the Brassicaceae family have been tested and used in various countries such as Italy, India, Australia, China, the United Kingdom, Spain, the United States, Argentina, South Africa, Germany, Switzerland (MATTHIESSEN & KIRKEGAARD, 2006;KIRKEGAARD, 2009;DONALD et al, 2010;PERNIOLA et al, 2012;LAzzERI et al, 2013;MICHEL, 2014;LADHALAKSHMI et al, 2015;WEI et al, 2016;PAN et al, 2017;RÍOS et al, 2017;DANEEL et al, 2018;DUTTA et al, 2019;JIN et al, 2019;CAMPANELLA et al, 2020;HANSCHEN & WINKELMANN, 2020;MORRIS et al, 2020), andBrazil (OLIVEIRA et al, 2011;BARROS et al, 2014;RONCATO et al, 2018). Results obtained around the world have been promising.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Biofumigation with species of the Brassicaceae family: a review

2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Biofumigation involves the release of volatile biocidal compounds in the soil through the incorporation of certain plants and their residues. Species of the Brassicaceae family are the most widely used plants for biofumigation. These plants contain glucosinolates, which produce compounds, such as isothiocyanates, following enzymatic hydrolysis, with scientifically proven fungicidal effects. The most commonly used brassica species belong to the genera Brassica, Raphanus, Sinapis, and Eruca. In addition to the release of compounds in the soil, complementary mechanisms, such as the supply of organic matter and nutrients, and improvement of the soil structure, also play a role in biofumigation. In the past two decades, several studies on the use of brassica residues in biofumigation have been published, showing promising results in the management of soil pathogens (fungi and oomycetes, nematodes, bacteria, and protozoa), weed seeds, and insects. Usage of new biofumigation compounds has also been validated in recent years, including the development of patented technological products such as liquid formulations and pellets. The objective of this article was to review these new developments, beginning with concepts related to biofumigation, and to discuss the mechanisms of action of compounds involving brassica species and the recommendations on usage. Promising examples of the use of this technique are also presented, further detailing the advances in basic and applied knowledge on the subject.

show abstract

Section: Biofumigation -Definition Benefits and Mechanisms Of Actionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Biofumigation -Definition Benefits and Mechanisms Of Actionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Glucosinolates and Isothiocyanatesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Biofumigation with species of the Brassicaceae family: a review

2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

A review of biofumigation effects with plant materials

Ji,

Zhang,

Fang

et al. 2024

New Plant Protection

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Continuous crop cultivation has exacerbated the issue of soil‐borne diseases, positioning soil biofumigation as a promising and environmentally friendly control method. This review comprehensively assesses recent advances in the use of Brassicaceae plant materials for biofumigation, specifically focusing on their effectiveness in managing soil‐borne pests, enhancing soil fertility, improving the composition of beneficial microbial communities, and boosting crop quality and yield. It also explores the mechanisms underlying biofumigation with Brassicaceae plants, highlighting that the incorporation of exogenous myrosinase can significantly increase isothiocyanate production, thereby enhancing the effectiveness of biofumigation. Among these, plants in the Brassica genus have been studied more extensively and have demonstrated superior results. Furthermore, the potential for biofumigation using plant materials from the Liliaceae, Gramineae, Compositae, and Leguminosae etc., families is evaluated. To address the challenge of inconsistent efficacy observed with different plant materials, future research should focus on optimizing biofumigation techniques according to local conditions. Additionally, combining biofumigation with physical and chemical methods, as well as implementing rotational application strategies, may enhance overall effectiveness.

show abstract

Potential inoculum sources of Fusarium species involved in asparagus decline syndrome and evaluation of soil disinfestation methods by qPCR protocols

Lastra

Marín-Guirao

López‐Moreno

et al. 2021

Pest Management Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BACKGROUND Asparagus decline syndrome (ADS), one of the most important diseases affecting asparagus crops, causes important yield losses worldwide. Fusarium proliferatum, F. oxysporum and F. redolens are among the main species associated with ADS. To explore their potential inoculum sources and the effectiveness of soil disinfestation practices for ADS management, molecular methods based on a quantitative real‐time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) were developed. qPCR‐based molecular tools demonstrated advantages in the sensitive and specific detection and quantification of fungal pathogens in comparison with less‐accurate and time‐consuming traditional culture methods. RESULTS F. proliferatum, F. oxysporum and F. redolens could be specifically detected and accurately quantified in asparagus plants, soil and irrigation water collected from asparagus fields with ADS symptoms by means of the designed TaqMan qPCR protocols. Furthermore, these molecular tools were successfully applied for evaluation of the efficacy of diverse soil disinfestation treatments. Chemical fumigation with dazomet and biosolarization with pellets of Brassica carinata contributed to a significant reduction in the inoculum densities of the three Fusarium species in treated soils, which was correlated with production increases. CONCLUSIONS The capability to accurately detect and quantify the main Fusarium species involved in ADS in plants, soil and water samples by means of qPCR will allow identification of high‐risk fields that can be avoided or managed to reduce yield losses. Quantification of pathogen densities in the soil may also provide essential insights into the effectiveness of soil disinfestation methods for ADS management. © 2021 Society of Chemical Industry.

show abstract

Biofumigation for Fighting Replant Disease- A Review

Cited by 34 publications

References 120 publications

Biofumigation with species of the Brassicaceae family: a review

Biofumigation with species of the Brassicaceae family: a review

A review of biofumigation effects with plant materials

Potential inoculum sources of Fusarium species involved in asparagus decline syndrome and evaluation of soil disinfestation methods by qPCR protocols

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About