Progress in these arenas has been driven by the discovery of inert, biocompatible polymers to provide the desired function without eliciting undesirable responses from the host environment. While concerns regarding the fate of these materials have led to an ongoing hunt for bioresorbable materials, it is important to note that synthetic polymers have been reported to elicit a biological response on their own. [2j,5] While the biological response is often toxic in nature and therefore undesirable for many applications, it poses a question: can the intrinsic bioactivity of synthetic polymers be harnessed for therapeutic interventions? This idea of intrinsic bioactivity is distinct from the long history of work pertaining to the use of synthetic polymers within biomedical settings. Polymers have indeed been extensively explored and continue to be investigated as (nano)carriers facilitating the delivery of bioactive payloads; in the majority of cases, the (nano)carrier bereft of its cargo is presented to provide little to no effect, demonstrating its role as an ideal delivery vehicle. [6] Polymers with intrinsic bioactivity diverge from this well-known concept by inducing biological change (i.e., bioactivity) by themselves in the absence of any conjugated or encapsulated species. [7] Interestingly, this previously posed question generated significant interest prior to the advent of drug-delivery approaches. [8] Among these early studies, a synthetic polymer, designated DIVEMA, garnered significant attention for its presentation of an outstanding breadth of bioactivity. [9] DIVEMA is a copolymer of divinyl ether (DVE) and maleic anhydride (MA) in a 1:2 ratio, with its proposed cyclopolymerization mechanism affording an in-chain pyran which consequently caused it to be more prominently known as Pyran copolymer. A hydrolyzed and neutralized version received the designation NSC 46015 and was approved for experimental clinical evaluation due to its antitumor activity against several cancers, including Adenocarcinoma 755, Lewis lung carcinoma, and Dunning ascites leukemia. [10] Moreover, its ability to induce interferon expression led to its evaluation against several viruses and reports of prophylactic action in murine models. DIVEMA has also demon strated antimicrobial activity against both Grampositive and Gram-negative bacteria and fungi. Despite this wide-ranging bioactivity, DIVEMA also presented a number of toxic side effects, the summation of which was not favorable for clinical use. Such side effects were common to many of the investigated synthetic polymers of the time and their failure in clinical trials is reflected in an absence of such therapeutic interventions as approved medicines.Synthetic polymers are omnipresent in society as textiles and packaging materials, in construction and medicine, among many other important applications. Alternatively, natural polymers play a crucial role in sustaining life and allowing organisms to adapt to their environments by performing key biological functions such as m...