2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.12.076
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biological and chemical removal of Cr(VI) from waste water: Cost and benefit analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The three formulas used in this study of CBA are Net Present Value (NPV), Benefit-Cost Ratio (BCR), and amortization time estimation formula, widely implemented for waste-related projects (Mishan 1972;Demir and Arisoy 2007;Bhatia 1977;Ali et al 2012;Soeylemez 2000) to determine the economic feasibility of the project.…”
Section: Methods For Economic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The three formulas used in this study of CBA are Net Present Value (NPV), Benefit-Cost Ratio (BCR), and amortization time estimation formula, widely implemented for waste-related projects (Mishan 1972;Demir and Arisoy 2007;Bhatia 1977;Ali et al 2012;Soeylemez 2000) to determine the economic feasibility of the project.…”
Section: Methods For Economic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has two oxidation states, trivalent (Cr III) and hexavalent (Cr VI). Chromium (III) is naturally occurring in the environment, is needed in the body as an essential nutrient and its toxicity is considered to be very low (Demir & Arisoy, 2007). Chromium (VI) does not normally occur in the environment, is recognized as being highly toxic, and classified as a Class I human carcinogen by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) (Goldoni et al, 2006).…”
Section: Heavy Metal Contaminationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several methodologies such as chemical oxidation, electrocoagulation, electrodeposition, filtration, adsorption, chemical precipitation, solvent exchange, photo-degradation and membrane separation technologies have been explored long ago to mitigate recalcitrant heavy metals from adulterated wastewater (Verma et al 2013;Rasool et al 2013;Kumar et al 2014;Zewaila and Yousef 2015). But these conventional methods proved unproductive due to their technical or economical constraints (Demir and Arisoy 2007;Cibati et al 2013;Verma et al 2015). Biological mechanisms impart a leading edge to current physico-chemical methods to wipe out noxious heavy metals from polluted waste water as they are eco-friendly, cost effective and do not produce colossal quantities of sludge (Cirik et al 2013;Wang et al 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%