2001
DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.1049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biological and cultural contradictions? A reply to MacEachern

Abstract: In his comment appearing in this issue of the AmericanJournal of Physical Anthropology, MacEachern(2001) questions some conclusions drawn in our longtermsurvey of genetic variation in Cameroon (Spediniet al., 1999). In our reply, we would like toclarify certain points so as to put AJPA readers in aposition whereby they understand both viewpoints

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These groups have frequently been dismissed by regional elites and Western observers (and sometimes by anthropologists) as backward hill people, the 'paleonigritic' populations of Froelich (1964Froelich ( , 1968, isolated and apparently autochthonous inhabitants of the region. There has been some discussion of the degree of genetic isolation of these groups from one another (MacEachern, 2001;Spedini et al, 1999Spedini et al, , 2001, but by 2006 their extensive interactions with neighbouring populations was not really in doubt. Moreover, genetic research demonstrates significant connections between these Chadic-speaking populations and populations in West Asia, the Nile Valley and Northern/Northeastern Africa (Cerny et al, 2004;Coia et al, 2005;Cruciani et al, 2002), as well as with other, sub-Saharan populations (Sansonetti et al, 1992;Spedini and Destro-Bisol, 1988;Spedini et al, 1999).…”
Section: ■ Genetics and Racial Identities Around The Saharamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These groups have frequently been dismissed by regional elites and Western observers (and sometimes by anthropologists) as backward hill people, the 'paleonigritic' populations of Froelich (1964Froelich ( , 1968, isolated and apparently autochthonous inhabitants of the region. There has been some discussion of the degree of genetic isolation of these groups from one another (MacEachern, 2001;Spedini et al, 1999Spedini et al, , 2001, but by 2006 their extensive interactions with neighbouring populations was not really in doubt. Moreover, genetic research demonstrates significant connections between these Chadic-speaking populations and populations in West Asia, the Nile Valley and Northern/Northeastern Africa (Cerny et al, 2004;Coia et al, 2005;Cruciani et al, 2002), as well as with other, sub-Saharan populations (Sansonetti et al, 1992;Spedini and Destro-Bisol, 1988;Spedini et al, 1999).…”
Section: ■ Genetics and Racial Identities Around The Saharamentioning
confidence: 99%