1995
DOI: 10.1016/0038-0717(95)98650-d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biological contaminants in North American legume inoculants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
12
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
4
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several quality assessments had shown that many biofertilisers evaluated do not have the manufacturers' declared microbial composition (Herridge et al, 2002;Herrmann et al, 2015;Singleton et al, 1997). In some situations, biofertilisers sold globally have been reported to contain no microbial species (Lupwayi et al, 2000;Olsen et al, 1995). These observations are corroborated by the results obtained in this study where some of the biofertilisers sampled did not have the expected microbes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Several quality assessments had shown that many biofertilisers evaluated do not have the manufacturers' declared microbial composition (Herridge et al, 2002;Herrmann et al, 2015;Singleton et al, 1997). In some situations, biofertilisers sold globally have been reported to contain no microbial species (Lupwayi et al, 2000;Olsen et al, 1995). These observations are corroborated by the results obtained in this study where some of the biofertilisers sampled did not have the expected microbes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…However, the results of independent tests published from time to time (e.g. Olsen et al, 1995;Schall et al, 1975;Skipper et al, 1980;Vincent and Smith, 1982) indicate that substantial proportions of the inoculants examined appear unsatisfactory for farmer use because of low populations of rhizobia and/or high numbers of microbial contaminants. Nevertheless, it is not clear to what extent legume crop failures in the United States are attributable to poor quality inoculants.…”
Section: Inoculant Quality Controlmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…It is a paradox that, despite nearly 100 years of experience, most of the inoculant produced in the world today is of relatively poor quality (e.g. Olsen et al, 1995) and that frankly some of it is extremely bad. Even good quality inoculants are often not used to best advantage.…”
Section: Concluding Remarks Prospects and Prognosticationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A Canadian survey showed the contamination level sometimes exceeded, by several orders of magnitude, the level of rhizobia in the inoculant, indicating poor quality inoculants. In at least one study, it was shown that the contaminant species had detrimental effects on the rhizobia (Olsen et al 1994b). It is still unknown whether these bacterial contaminants present any health hazards to humans, animals, and plants.…”
Section: Regulation and Control Of Contamination Of Commercial Inoculmentioning
confidence: 99%