2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2011.03.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biological Cr(VI) removal coupled with biomass growth, biomass decay, and multiple substrate limitation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Biotransformation of heavy metals is a promising technique to convert toxic heavy metals to less toxic forms (Contreras et al 2011). Microorganisms play an important role in transformation of heavy metals from toxic form to less toxic form.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Biotransformation of heavy metals is a promising technique to convert toxic heavy metals to less toxic forms (Contreras et al 2011). Microorganisms play an important role in transformation of heavy metals from toxic form to less toxic form.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, Cr(III) has a strong affinity for negatively charged ions and colloids in soils and can be precipitated as Cr(OH) 3 at neutral pH and, thus, is relatively immobile and less available for biological uptake. Conversely, hexavalent chromium has a higher solubility and mobility, and is more bioavailable than Cr(III) (Contreras et al 2011). Therefore, transformation of Cr(VI) to Cr(III) is an effective measure to reduce the hazardous effect of Cr(VI) on our environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, Cr(VI) species are known to be highly toxic and readily mobile in biological systems, causing serious health problems such as liver damage and pulmonary complications (Eary and Rai, 1988;Yurik and Pikaev, 1999). Therefore, Cr(VI) reduction methods for remediating Crcontaminated sites have been actively investigated, including conventional chemical reduction (Lan et al, 2005(Lan et al, , 2006Li et al, 2007); photocatalytic reduction (Gaberell et al, 2003;Sun et al, 2009;Tian et al, 2010); electrochemical reduction (Lakshmipathiraj et al, 2008;Olmez, 2009); and bioreduction (Cheung and Gu, 2007;Patra et al, 2010;Contreras et al, 2011). Cr(III), the product of Cr(VI) reduction, is subsequently removed from 2006; Zhou et al, 2007); however, the extremely fine particle sizes of schwertmannite render it very difficult to be utilized in combination with traditional filtration techniques in practice, i.e., solid-liquid separation (Eskandarpour et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Individual removal of Cr(VI) 32 or dye 33 have been reported in the literature by various researchers. Whereas, few reports are available on simultaneous removal of dye and Cr(VI) by using bacterial isolates in pure culture or in a consortium.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%