2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.02.124
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biological groundwater treatment for chromium removal at low hexavalent chromium concentrations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
26
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In case of aerobic system oxygen was the competitive electron acceptor to Cr(VI) resulting reduction of O2 to oxide ion resulted lacking of Cr(VI) reduction. [166] Anaerobic and anoxic conditions were employed to determine the Cr(VI) reduction ability in two sequencing bioreactors (SBR) fed with groundwater of 3L (total volume of reactor=5 L). The design parameters were 0.…”
Section: Biocharmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In case of aerobic system oxygen was the competitive electron acceptor to Cr(VI) resulting reduction of O2 to oxide ion resulted lacking of Cr(VI) reduction. [166] Anaerobic and anoxic conditions were employed to determine the Cr(VI) reduction ability in two sequencing bioreactors (SBR) fed with groundwater of 3L (total volume of reactor=5 L). The design parameters were 0.…”
Section: Biocharmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the extensive literature on the biological reduction of Cr(VI) to Cr(III) (Dong et al, ; Lai et al, ), there is limited literature on biological Cr(VI) removal from groundwater sources using contact times typically practiced at a water treatment facility. Previous studies were conducted with high Cr(VI) concentrations (i.e., in mg/L) (Lai et al, ) or with a long contact time (Mamais et al, ; Panousi et al, ). Furthermore, previous studies failed to evaluate the resiliency of the treatment process or characterize the residuals of the treatment process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is not only because of its high organic load, but also because of the large volume generated. Only a few studies have been published using cheese whey for Cr(VI) reduction [16,22,[27][28][29][30][31][32][33] and most of these were performed for in-situ groundwater and soil remediation [22,[30][31][32][33], while the remainder took place in pilot-scale suspended growth systems (activated sludge technology) [16,[27][28][29]. Another low-cost carbon source that was examined for Cr(VI) reduction was liquid pineapple waste by Zakaria et al [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%