2016
DOI: 10.1017/s1751731116000343
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biological mechanisms related to differences in residual feed intake in dairy cows

Abstract: Residual feed intake (RFI), defined as the difference between an animal's actual feed intake and expected feed intake over a specific period, is an inheritable character of feed conversion efficiency in dairy cows. Research has shown that a lower RFI could improve the profitability of milk production. This study explored variation in RFI by comparing the differences in body size, milk performance, feeding behavior, and serum metabolites in 29 Holstein cows in mid lactation. The cows were selected from a total … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
31
1
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
5
31
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The moderate correlation coefficients between eating rate and visit or meal size to daily DMI in our study was in accordance with previous studies showing eating behavior of lactating cows fed a high-concentrate TMR (Azizi et al, 2009;Connor et al, 2013;Halachmi et al, 2016) and supports our hypothesis. However, Xi et al (2016) stated that the higher (by 8.1%) DMI of LEf over HEf cows originated from the greater daily eating duration of the LEf cows without a significant difference in eating rate. A possible explanation for the discrepancy between our study and that of Xi et al (2016) might be associated with differences in the management systems.…”
Section: Correlation Between Behavior Parameters and Dmimentioning
confidence: 98%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The moderate correlation coefficients between eating rate and visit or meal size to daily DMI in our study was in accordance with previous studies showing eating behavior of lactating cows fed a high-concentrate TMR (Azizi et al, 2009;Connor et al, 2013;Halachmi et al, 2016) and supports our hypothesis. However, Xi et al (2016) stated that the higher (by 8.1%) DMI of LEf over HEf cows originated from the greater daily eating duration of the LEf cows without a significant difference in eating rate. A possible explanation for the discrepancy between our study and that of Xi et al (2016) might be associated with differences in the management systems.…”
Section: Correlation Between Behavior Parameters and Dmimentioning
confidence: 98%
“…These limits for RFI and ECM/DMI values used to characterize HEf and LEf cows were chosen based on the study of Ben Shabat et al (2016). The decision to select the upper and lower 20% as HEf or LEf cows was based on previous studies (Ben Shabat et al, 2016;Xi et al, 2016). The remaining 60% in the range of RFI between 0 to 2.75 or ECM/DMI between 1.4 to 1.57 were defined as mid-efficiency (MEf) cows.…”
Section: Animals Feeding Regimen and Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations