2002
DOI: 10.1002/gea.10004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biomantle formation and artifact translocation in upland sandy soils: An example from the Holly Springs National Forest, north‐central Mississippi, U.S.A.

Abstract: Test excavations at prehistoric site 22MR539 in the North Central Hills uplands of Mississippi have provided evidence of the effects of bioturbation on artifacts within the soil. Artifact distribution and size data are compared to soil particle size and organic content to determine the soil developmental pathway. Progressive soil formation factors have formed a biomantle over a currently forming artifact stone line, while regressive factors have moved artifacts to a depth of more than 50 cm below surface over … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
16
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
5
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To this end, we employed the dynamic denudation approach, which allows for expanded explanatory options in process archaeology, geomorphology, and pedology (cf. Johnson et al, 2002Johnson et al, , 2005aJohnson, 2002;Balek, 2002;Peacock and Fant, 2002;Van Nest, 2002). This approach is useful in profiles and at sites where bioturbation and biosorting are either dominant processes, or co-equal with "normal" horizonation processeswhich include most soils, and, therefore, most open archaeological sites.…”
Section: Research-philosophical Approach and "Method"mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…To this end, we employed the dynamic denudation approach, which allows for expanded explanatory options in process archaeology, geomorphology, and pedology (cf. Johnson et al, 2002Johnson et al, , 2005aJohnson, 2002;Balek, 2002;Peacock and Fant, 2002;Van Nest, 2002). This approach is useful in profiles and at sites where bioturbation and biosorting are either dominant processes, or co-equal with "normal" horizonation processeswhich include most soils, and, therefore, most open archaeological sites.…”
Section: Research-philosophical Approach and "Method"mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In upland settings, including those favored by the Maya for residential settlement (Ashmore 1981 a), building remains are buried primarily by bioturbation (Johnston 2002:5-12). As an outcome, architectural remains can become buried by sinking to the bottom of the "biomantle," or the uppermost, organic-rich soil layer in which the faunal and floral agents of bioturbation are most active (Balek 2002; Johnson 1989Johnson , 2002Peacock and Fant 2002;Van Nest 2002). During bioturbation, soil matter is vertically and horizontally mixed and reorganized by the burrowing activities of faunal agents, including earthworms and other agents, and the lateral movement and uprooting of tree roots (Balek 2002; Johnson and Watson-Stegner 1990; Van Nest 2002; Wood and Johnson 1978).…”
Section: Invisible Settlement: the Research Challengementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cook stones in pit features were originally placed about 25 cm below the surface, which tends to be in the lower portion of, or just below, the most active zone of pedoturbation (cf. Balek, 2002;Bocek, 1986;Peacock and Fant, 2002;Smith, 1984Smith, , 2000Van Nest, 2002). In forested areas, tree throws and stump burns through the millennia are likely to impact even the most robust and deeply buried cook-stone features (Thoms, 1996(Thoms, , 2007a.…”
Section: Salient Characteristics Of Cook Stones and Hot-rock Cookerymentioning
confidence: 97%