2021
DOI: 10.1002/cpt.2194
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biomarker‐Guided Individualization of Antibiotic Therapy

Abstract: Treatment failure of antibiotic therapy due to insufficient efficacy or occurrence of toxicity is a major clinical challenge, and is expected to become even more urgent with the global rise of antibiotic resistance. Strategies to optimize treatment in individual patients are therefore of crucial importance. Currently, therapeutic drug monitoring plays an important role in optimizing antibiotic exposure to reduce treatment failure and toxicity. Biomarker-based strategies may be a powerful tool to further quanti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
67
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 101 publications
1
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We expect that such factors will not affect specific subpopulations studied in different ways and therefore not have a great impact on the general findings we do in this analysis. The developed modelling framework is applicable for design of clinical treatment designs for specific antibiotic agents and pathogens, where the model can be further expanded with additional pathogen-, drug-, and patient-specific characteristics 36 , derived from separate experimental studies and by utilizing published clinical population PK models for specific antibiotics 37,38 , which include inter-individual variability or target site concentrations at the site of infection. This would thus allow to derive tailored CS-based dosing regimens for specific antibiotics and pathogens.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We expect that such factors will not affect specific subpopulations studied in different ways and therefore not have a great impact on the general findings we do in this analysis. The developed modelling framework is applicable for design of clinical treatment designs for specific antibiotic agents and pathogens, where the model can be further expanded with additional pathogen-, drug-, and patient-specific characteristics 36 , derived from separate experimental studies and by utilizing published clinical population PK models for specific antibiotics 37,38 , which include inter-individual variability or target site concentrations at the site of infection. This would thus allow to derive tailored CS-based dosing regimens for specific antibiotics and pathogens.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The complexity of modeling endogenous substrates, however, requires a good understanding of the kinetics of production and degradation. A recent analysis based on daily measurements of procalcitonin in patients with sepsis has allowed for the construction of such a model that includes initial conditions at the start of therapy, a lag time for response to therapy, first-order production and degradation rate constants for procalcitonin, and random effect terms to account for treatment variation and immune response [ 48 ]. These non-linear mixed effects models extend the simple single-point interpretations of biomarkers such as procalcitonin by integrating repeated measures and forecasting the response to therapy.…”
Section: Systemic Efficacy Biomarkers Of Inflammation and Infectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Drug effect was parameterized using a classical inhibitory function with the set to the theoretical upper limit of 1 (100% inhibition of procalcitonin production) and the vancomycin concentration ( ) producing 50% of the maximal response ( ) set to 10 mg/L, which approximates a clinically relevant vancomycin trough concentration. The first-order elimination rate constant of procalcitonin ( k out ) was set to 0.0289 h −1 ( t 1/2 24 h) [ 48 ]. The population baseline procalcitonin level was set to 3.6 ng/mL to be representative of a S. aureus bacteremia population [ 53 ].…”
Section: Case Study Illustrating Exposure–response-matching Using Biomarkersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a new type of marker, sCD14 (presepsin) has received extensive clinical and laboratory attention. 10 , 11 It is a truncated subtype of soluble CD14 composed of 64 amino acids and induces the differentiation of activated macrophages in response to membrane-bound protein soluble fragment of 14 (CD14) expressed by bacterial lipopolysaccharides. 12 CD14 is a coreceptor of Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) that binds the lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-lipopolysaccharide binding protein (LBP) complex, thereby promoting LPS-induced TLR4 activation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%